Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39949471›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2025

Adulteration detection in cactus seed oil: Integrating analytical chemistry and machine learning approaches.

Said El Harkaoui, Cristina Ortiz Cruz, Aaron Roggenland, Micha Schneider, Sascha Rohn, Stephan Drusch, Bertrand Matthäus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Said El HarkaouiMax Rubner-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Nutrition and Food, Department for Safety and Quality of Cereals, Schützenberg 12, 32756, Detmold, Germany.
Cristina Ortiz CruzMax Rubner-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Nutrition and Food, Zentralabteilung, Haid-und-Neu-Str. 9, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Aaron RoggenlandMax Rubner-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Nutrition and Food, Zentralabteilung, Schützenberg 12, 32756, Detmold, Germany.
Micha SchneiderJohann Heinrich von Thünen Institute - Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries, Bundesallee 50, 38116, Braunschweig, Germany.
Sascha RohnDepartment of Food Chemistry and Analysis, Institute of Food Technology and Food Chemistry, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Stephan DruschDepartment of Food Technology and Food Material Science, Institute of Food Technology and Food Chemistry, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Bertrand MatthäusMax Rubner-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Nutrition and Food, Department for Safety and Quality of Cereals, Schützenberg 12, 32756, Detmold, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Economically motivated adulteration threatens both consumer rights and market integrity, particularly with high-value cold-pressed oils like cactus seed oil (CO). This study proposes a machine learning model that integrates analytical measurements, data simulations, and classification techniques to detect adulteration of CO with refined sunflower oil (SO) and determine the detectable limit of adulteration without measuring a huge number of different mixtures. First, pure CO and SO samples were analyzed for their fatty acid, triacylglycerol, and tocochromanol content using HPLC or GC. The resulting oil composition data served as the foundation for further simulations. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations outperformed Conditional Tabular Generative Adversarial Networks (CTGAN) in simulating realistic oil compositions, with MC yielding lower Kullback-Leibler Divergence values compared to CTGAN. The MC-simulated data were then used to simulate larger datasets, a critical step for training and testing two classification models: Random Forest (RF) and Neural Networks (NN), as robust training cannot be achieved with small sample sizes. Both models achieved good classification accuracies, with RF achieving higher accuracy than NN, reaching 94% on simulated datasets and 90% on real-world samples with detectable adulteration levels as low as 1%. RF also offers better interpretability and is computational less demanding as compared to NN which makes it advantageous for authenticity verification in this study. Therefore, combining MC simulation with RF as a robust method for detecting CO adulteration is proposed. The proposed method, coded in Python and available as open-source, offers a flexible framework for continuous adaptation with new data.

Indexed as

AuthenticityCactus seed oilConditional generative adversarial networkMachine learningMonte-CarloNeural networkRandom Forest

Identifiers

PMID39949471
PMCPMC11821398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.