ArticleCureus2025
A Case of Prolonged Bradycardia and Hypotension After Ingestion of Incorrect Guanfacine Formulation.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Guanfacine is an alpha-two agonist commonly manufactured in two formulations, an extended-release formulation primarily used for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the pediatric population, and an instant-release formulation primarily used for the treatment of hypertension in the adult population. Formulation errors can cause profound adverse effects, especially given the different intended uses for each patient population. We present the case of a six-year-old male who was mistakenly prescribed 2 mg of instant-release guanfacine as opposed to his usual 2 mg of extended-release guanfacine. He presented to the emergency department (ED) with lethargy, bradycardia, hypotension and eventually required initiation of vasopressors. He was admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) due to hemodynamic instability, where he metabolized the ingestion and clinically improved over the subsequent 34 hours. This case was unique as it demonstrates a profound alteration in hemodynamics after a seemingly small medication error, which is not often reported for this medication. This case report also demonstrates the importance of recognizing specific medication formulations and highlights the need for careful medication prescribing and dispensing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.