Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39949468›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Case of Prolonged Bradycardia and Hypotension After Ingestion of Incorrect Guanfacine Formulation.

John Coacci, Robert Schwaner

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John CoacciEmergency Medicine, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, USA.
Robert SchwanerEmergency Medicine and Medical Toxicology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guanfacine is an alpha-two agonist commonly manufactured in two formulations, an extended-release formulation primarily used for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the pediatric population, and an instant-release formulation primarily used for the treatment of hypertension in the adult population. Formulation errors can cause profound adverse effects, especially given the different intended uses for each patient population. We present the case of a six-year-old male who was mistakenly prescribed 2 mg of instant-release guanfacine as opposed to his usual 2 mg of extended-release guanfacine. He presented to the emergency department (ED) with lethargy, bradycardia, hypotension and eventually required initiation of vasopressors. He was admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) due to hemodynamic instability, where he metabolized the ingestion and clinically improved over the subsequent 34 hours. This case was unique as it demonstrates a profound alteration in hemodynamics after a seemingly small medication error, which is not often reported for this medication. This case report also demonstrates the importance of recognizing specific medication formulations and highlights the need for careful medication prescribing and dispensing.

Indexed as

attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (adhd)clonidinecritical careemergency medicineguanfacineingestionmedical toxicologymedication error preventionpediatric neurologypediatric pharmacology

Identifiers

PMID39949468
PMCPMC11824513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.