Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39949463›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

The Clinical Effectiveness of Propolis on the Endodontic Treatment of Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials and Updates.

Amirah Y Aldosari, Amira M Aljared, Hanin S Alqurshy, Abdullah M Alfarran, Mohanad G Alnahdi, Sarah S Alharbi, Wed S Alharbi, Faisal T Alghamdi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amirah Y AldosariGeneral Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Amira M AljaredGeneral Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Hanin S AlqurshyGeneral Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Abdullah M AlfarranGeneral Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Mohanad G AlnahdiGeneral Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Sarah S AlharbiGeneral Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, SAU.
Wed S AlharbiGeneral Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Faisal T AlghamdiOral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endodontic treatment of permanent teeth (immature and mature) with propolis in healthy patients remains uncertain, with conflicting evidence. Therefore, this systematic review aims to evaluate the current literature on the safety and efficacy of propolis in endodontic procedures. An extensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, and Google Scholar. Only human randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that explored the clinical applications of propolis in endodontics were considered. Narrative synthesis was performed, and the risk of bias (RoB) for methodological quality assessment was performed with the Cochrane RoB-2 via the Robvis web-based application. Eight RCTs were selected, focusing on using propolis in vital pulps for direct pulp capping and non-vital pulps for root canal disinfection and filling materials. Propolis demonstrated promising effects, including controlling inflammation, promoting tissue healing, and disinfecting the root canal system. However, no significant differences were observed when comparing propolis to other materials used in pulp capping or intracanal medicaments. The RoB assessment revealed varied levels of risk, with two studies exhibiting a high risk, three having unclear risks, and three showing low risk. Moderate certainty of evidence was observed. Based on the current evidence, there is insufficient data to recommend propolis over other materials in the treatment of vital or non-vital pulps in permanent teeth. Propolis was not recommended as a definitive treatment due to the limited evidence and variability in the clinical outcomes across studies. However, future high-quality RCTs are essential for more definitive conclusions.

Indexed as

bee waxendodonticsintracanal medicamentpropolispulp cappingrandomized clinical trialreview

Identifiers

PMID39949463
PMCPMC11824515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.