ArticleCureus2025
Association Between Dietary Supplement Use and Academic Achievement Among University Students in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Dietary supplements are commonly utilized worldwide, including in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), primarily to improve memory, focus, wakefulness, learning, and academic achievement. Nevertheless, there is still uncertainty regarding their efficacy and safety, particularly concerning academic performance. This study examines the prevalence of dietary supplement use among students in KSA and how this affects their academic performance. Methodology The current study was a cross-sectional study conducted in KSA between 2022 and 2024 on a sample size of 513 students aged ≥18 years, as calculated by Epi Info software (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States). A self-administered online questionnaire was designed, tested for validity and reliability, and then propagated via social media. It included four parts assessing the socio-demographic, past medical and medication history, academic information, and dietary supplement use. Results The results showed that 360 (70.2%) participants used dietary supplements, while most of them, 141 (39.2%), used a combination of supplements. Users who reported taking supplements every day were 266 (73.9% of supplement users), and the supplement-related adverse effects occurred in about 147 (41% of supplement users). The most commonly reported side effects were headaches, sleeplessness, and irritability. No discernible influence of any of the reported dietary supplements on academic achievement was identified, despite the high prevalence of supplement usage and the related negative effects. A high percentage of the participants had incorrect knowledge about dietary supplements - 262 (51.1%) had a false belief that supplements can improve their achievement and 238 (46.4%) considered them completely safe with no risks of adverse effects. Conclusions Nutritional supplement intake was highly prevalent among KSA students; however, no positive association was identified between academic achievement and any of the used supplements (caffeine, creatine, curcumin, omega-3 fatty acids,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.