Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39949412›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Differential responses of soil C, N, and P ecological stoichiometric characteristics to different configurations of edge-locked forests in the Kubuqi Desert.

Xue Chen, Hejun Zuo, Min Yan, Haibing Wang, Cheng Xi, Yinchao Chai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Long-Term Effects of a 35-Year Chronosequence ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xue ChenInner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Aeolian Physics and Desertification Control Engineering, College of Desert Control Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Hejun ZuoInner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Aeolian Physics and Desertification Control Engineering, College of Desert Control Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Min YanInner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Aeolian Physics and Desertification Control Engineering, College of Desert Control Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Haibing WangInner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Aeolian Physics and Desertification Control Engineering, College of Desert Control Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Cheng XiInner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Aeolian Physics and Desertification Control Engineering, College of Desert Control Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Yinchao ChaiInner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Aeolian Physics and Desertification Control Engineering, College of Desert Control Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a vital component of the desert ecological protection system, the edge-locked forests of the Kubuqi Desert play a crucial role in mitigating wind erosion, stabilizing sand, maintaining soil and water, and restricting desert expansion. In this paper, six types of standard protection forests in the Kubuqi Desert, namely

Indexed as

and PCdesertificationecological stoichiometryedge-locked forestsKubuqi DesertNparticle size characterization

Identifiers

PMID39949412
PMCPMC11821981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.