Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39949403›Full record

ReviewBrain communications2025

The cingulum: anatomy, connectivity and what goes beyond.

Linda Kollenburg, Hisse Arnts, Alexander Green, Ido Strauss, Saman Vinke, Erkan Kurt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Post mortem MRI of cholinergic white matter pathways across neurodegenerative diseases.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Good vibrations: Sternal vibration enhances white matter density and interoceptive awareness.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Histopathological findings in the brain decades after cingulotomy: An autopsy case.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Linda KollenburgDepartment of Neurosurgery, Functional Neurosurgery Unit, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525 GA,Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1044-2838
Hisse ArntsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Functional Neurosurgery Unit, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525 GA,Netherlands.
Alexander GreenOxford Functional Neurosurgery and Experimental Neurology Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford OX39DU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7262-7297
Ido StraussDepartment of Neurosurgery, Functional Neurosurgery Unit, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv 6801298, Israel.
Saman VinkeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Functional Neurosurgery Unit, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525 GA,Netherlands.
Erkan KurtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Functional Neurosurgery Unit, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525 GA,Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For over half a century, the cingulum has been the subject of neuroanatomical and therapeutic investigations owing to its wide range of functions and involvement in various neurological and psychiatric diseases. Recent clinical studies investigating neurosurgical techniques targeting the cingulum, like deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex and cingulotomy, have further boosted interests in this central 'hub' as a target for chronic intractable pain. Proper targeting within the cingulum is essential to achieve sufficient pain relief. Despite the cingulum being the centre of research for over a century, its structural and functional organization remains a subject to debate, consequently complicating neurosurgical targeting of this area. This study aims to review anatomical and connectivity data of the cingulum from a clinical perspective in order to improve understanding of its role in pain. For the current study, a systematic literature search was performed to assess the anatomy and functional and structural connectivity of the cingulate bundle and cortex. These outcomes focus on MRI and PET data. Articles were searched within the PubMed database, and additional articles were found manually through reviews or references cited within the articles. After exclusion, 70 articles remained included in this analysis, with 50, 29 and 10 studies describing human, monkey and rat subjects, respectively. Outcomes of this analysis show the presence of various anatomical models, each describing other subdivisions within the cingulum. Moreover, connectivity data suggest that the cingulate bundle consists of three distinct fibre projections, including the thalamocortical, cingulate gyrus and anterior frontal and posterior parietal projections. Further, the cingulum is responsible for a variety of functions involved in chronic pain, like sensory processing, memory, spatial functioning, reward, cognition, emotion, visceromotor and endocrine control. Based on the current outcomes, it can be concluded that the cingulum is a central 'hub' for pain processing, because it is a melting pot for memory, cognition and affect that are involved in the complex phenomenon of pain experience, memory, spatial functioning, reward, cognition, emotion, visceromotor and endocrine control. Variability in anatomical and connectivity models complicate proper and standardized neurosurgical targeting, consequently leading to clinicians often being reluctant on stimulation and/or lesioning of the cingulum. Hence, future research should be dedicated to the standardization of these models, to allow for optimal targeting and management of patients with chronic intractable pain.

Indexed as

anatomycingulotomycingulumconnectivitydeep brain stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39949403
PMCPMC11824423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.