Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39949386›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Effects of the Paediatric Regulation funding on the development of off-patent medicines in children.

Lucia Ruggieri, Silvia Torretta, Viviana Giannuzzi, Alessandra Natale, Mariagrazia Felisi, Adriana Ceci, Fedele Bonifazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lucia Ruggieri *Department of Research and Innovation, Fondazione per la Ricerca Farmacologica Gianni Benzi Onlus, Bari, Italy.
Silvia Torretta *Department of Research and Innovation, Fondazione per la Ricerca Farmacologica Gianni Benzi Onlus, Bari, Italy.
Viviana GiannuzziDepartment of Research and Innovation, Fondazione per la Ricerca Farmacologica Gianni Benzi Onlus, Bari, Italy.
Alessandra NataleTEDDY European Network of Excellence for Paediatric Research, Pavia, Italy.
Mariagrazia FelisiTEDDY European Network of Excellence for Paediatric Research, Pavia, Italy.
Adriana CeciDepartment of Research and Innovation, Fondazione per la Ricerca Farmacologica Gianni Benzi Onlus, Bari, Italy.
Fedele BonifaziDepartment of Research and Innovation, Fondazione per la Ricerca Farmacologica Gianni Benzi Onlus, Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In paediatrics, medicines repurposing is a particularly advantageous approach, offering a route to address unmet medical needs and turn off-label use into evidence-based treatments for paediatric populations. This study analysed the effects of funds provided under the Seventh Framework Programme for Research (FP7-FRP), issued by the European Commission from 2007 to 2013 according to the European Paediatric Regulation, in terms of new paediatric marketing authorisations (MAs) including paediatric Use Marketing Authorisations (PUMAs). Additionally, we investigated which funded projects included repurposing initiatives. Methods: Data was collected on paediatric Investigation Plans (PIPs), new MAs, and MAs variations from the EMA website, national medicine registers, and final project reports. A survey to project coordinators was also conducted to explore the challenges faced during paediatric drug development plans. Results: The 20 FP7-funded projects studied 24 off-patent active substances. Eighteen substances had agreed PIPs with the European Medicines Agency paediatric Committee (PDCO). Positive compliance checks were granted for three PIPs, resulting in three new PUMAs. According to the adopted definition, 22 out of 24 (91.6%) paediatric development plans could be classified as repurposing. New conditions were proposed for eight substances, while 16 aimed to extend existing indications to broader paediatric populations. Additionally, 18 development plans included new age-appropriate formulations. The survey revealed that primary challenges in paediatric development plans included budgeting, lengthy regulatory processes, and recruitment. Discussion: Taken together, these results highlighted on one hand that the FP7 programme had a positive impact, as three new PUMAs were effectively obtained, representing one third of the nine PUMAs obtained since the paediatric Regulation entered into force, and three out of 18 agreed PIPs were successfully completed within 3-10 years. In addition, repurposing existing drugs for paediatric use significantly contributed to addressing unmet medical needs in paediatrics. On the other hand, the gap between the number of agreed PIPs and those that have led to PUMAs is still considerable, due to regulatory barriers and financial constraints. This underscores the need for continued support and further initiatives to streamline public-private partnerships for paediatric drug development, ensuring that off-patent medicines can be safely and effectively repurposed for paediatric use.

Indexed as

European Paediatric Regulationoff-patentpaediatric medicinespublic-private partnershiprepurposingSeventh Framework Programme

Identifiers

PMID39949386
PMCPMC11823639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.