ArticleEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2025
Criteria for early discharge of drowning patients from the emergency department.
Article in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveClinical factors previously shown to independently predict safe discharge were applied at ED presentation to determine whether we could identify a group of drowning patients who do not require treatment and are thus safe for rapid discharge.
methodWe conducted a retrospective study of drowning presentations to EDs of the Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service in Queensland, Australia between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2022. Rapid discharge criteria (RDC) were defined as a normal spontaneous respiratory rate (adjusted for age), a normal peripheral blood saturation (≥94%) on room air, an Alert measurement on the Alert, Voice, Pain, Unresponsive scale, clear chest auscultation and the absence of any requirement for oxygen or other ventilatory assistance from Emergency Medical Services. Primary outcome was the requirement for treatment (oxygen, ventilation or airway intervention).
resultsFive hundred and seventy-seven drowning presentations were included. Two hundred and fifty-five (44.2%) patients met RDC at ED presentation. Patients meeting RDC were more likely to be younger (median 9 years, IQR 3-21 vs 20 years, IQR 4-44, P < 0.016) than those with not meeting RDC. Eight patients meeting RDC had received bystander CPR. There were no deaths in the RDC group (0/255 (0%) vs 17/322 (5.3%), P < 0.016). No patient meeting RDC required treatment (0/255 (0%) vs 145/322 (45.0%), P < 0.016).
conclusionsDrowning patients who meet rapid discharge criteria at ED presentation will not require treatment for their drowning and may be considered for discharge from the ED without further investigation or mandatory period of observation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.