ArticleJournal of food science2025
Characterizing the odor of New Zealand native plants using sensory analysis and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Article in Journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Thermal and Freeze-Drying on the Volatile Composition of Mountain Horopito (Pseudowintera colorata) and Kawakawa (Piper excelsum).Journal of food science · 2026Article
- Characterizing the Flavor of New Zealand Native Plants Using Consumer-Derived Attributes and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.Journal of food science · 2026Article
- Analysis of Bound Form Terpenes in Different Agricultural Byproducts.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Influence of Traditional Vanilla Curing on Its Physicochemical Properties and Aromatic Profile.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Characterizing the odor of New Zealand native plants using sensory analysis and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.Journal of food science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is growing interest by consumers worldwide for edible indigenous plants and wild foods. To highlight and enhance their unique sensory properties, comprehensive sensory characterization is essential to understand and refine their sensory attributes. The aim of this study was to characterize the odor of six edible native New Zealand plants that have significant potential in food applications, using sensory analysis and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and uncover the link between annotated volatile compounds and the desirable odor attributes that drive consumer acceptance. A lexicon of 22 odor attributes was developed through six focus groups of six consumers each (n = 36). A Rate All That Apply (RATA) trial was undertaken with consumers (n = 121) to describe the intensity of the odor attributes and overall consumer liking of the odor of each plant. Results showed the characterization of the plant's odor differed significantly across species. Horopito was characterized as "herby," "peppery," "spicy," "minty," and "citrus"; kawakawa was "sour," "sweet," "floral," and "fruity"; pikopiko and kiokio were "earthy/musty," "dry grass/hay," and "fishy"; red matipo was "sweet," "fruity," "sour," "leafy," and "green tea"; and lemonwood was "leafy" and "grassy." Horopito was the most preferred odor by consumers, and pikopiko the least. GC-MS annotated 178 volatile compounds and their peak intensity across the six species. Stepwise regression shortlisted 42 volatile compounds (of which terpenes were the most common) that best explained each of the 22 odor attributes. These results can assist with the application of these native plants as food ingredients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.