Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39949184›Full record

ReviewWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society

Pressure injuries and biofilms: Microbiome, model systems and therapies.

Fahad Kabir, Deborah Bow Yue Yung, Waleska Stephanie da Cruz Nizer, Kira Noelle Allison, Sandra Zigic, Emily Russell, Katrina G DeZeeuw, Jonah E Marek, Edana Cassol, Daniel Pletzer and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Pressure injuries and biofilms: Microbiome, model systems and therapies.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Fahad KabirDepartment of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Deborah Bow Yue YungDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-4086-3869
Waleska Stephanie da Cruz NizerDepartment of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kira Noelle AllisonDepartment of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sandra ZigicDepartment of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Emily RussellDepartment of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Katrina G DeZeeuwDepartment of Complex Continuing Care, Saint Vincent Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jonah E MarekDepartment of Complex Continuing Care, Saint Vincent Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Edana CassolDepartment of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel PletzerDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Joerg OverhageDepartment of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-6721-2580

Funding

Bruyère Academic Medical Organization (BAMO) Innovation GrantCarleton University International Research Seed GrantCarleton University Research Development Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic wounds have emerged as significant clinical problems owing to their increasing incidence and greater recognition of associated morbidity and socio-economic burden. They are defined as wounds that do not progress normally through the stages of healing in a timely and/or orderly manner. Pressure injuries, in particular, represent a serious problem for patients who are elderly or have limited mobility, such as wheelchair users or those who spend most of the day in bed. These injuries often result from prolonged pressure exerted on the skin over the bone. Treatment of pressure injuries is complex and costly. Emerging evidence suggests that the pressure injury microbiome plays a vital role in chronic wound formation and delaying wound healing. Additionally, antibiotics often fail due to the formation of resistant biofilms and the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. In this review, we will summarise the current knowledge on: (a) biofilms and microbiomes in pressure injuries; (b) in vitro and in vivo model systems to study pressure injuries, and (c) current therapies and novel treatment approaches. Understanding the complex interactions between microbes and the host immune system in pressure injuries will provide valuable insights to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

BiofilmsMicrobiotaPressure UlcerWound HealingWound InfectionAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansAnti-Bacterial Agentsbiofilmschronic woundsmicrobiomepressure injurytreatmentwound healing

Identifiers

PMID39949184
PMCPMC11826131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.