Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39949075›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2025

Surveillance of Barrett's Esophagus Patients in an Expert Center is Associated With Low Disease-Specific Mortality.

Judith Honing, W Keith Tan, Victor Yan Zhe Lu, Vlasios Gourgiotis, Isaac M Gianfrancesco, Alina A Schumacher, Shriya Vishwanathan, Calvin Cheah, Ines Modolell, Vijay Sujendran and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Judith HoningEarly Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
W Keith TanEarly Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Victor Yan Zhe LuEarly Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6818-1683
Vlasios GourgiotisEarly Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1448-5868
Isaac M GianfrancescoSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Alina A SchumacherSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Shriya VishwanathanEarly Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Calvin CheahEarly Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ines ModolellDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Vijay SujendranCambridge Oesophagogastric Centre, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Rebecca C FitzgeraldEarly Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Massimiliano di PietroEarly Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK CTRQQR-2021\100012NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Center BRC-1215-20014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSpecialist guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance for Barrett's esophagus to reduce mortality related to esophageal adenocarcinoma, but the setting for optimal Barrett's esophagus monitoring is unclear. We assessed progression rate and disease-specific mortality in a large cohort of patients followed up at a single Barrett's esophagus expert center.

methodsFor this prospective longitudinal single center cohort study, we recruited patients with a previous diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus between 2004 and 2022. Endoscopists were trained in Barrett's esophagus surveillance standards and image-enhanced techniques, and biopsies were reviewed by expert pathologists. Exclusion criteria were a single surveillance endoscopy, high-grade dysplasia, or esophageal adenocarcinoma at or within 12 months from index endoscopy and patients with < 12 months follow-up. The primary outcome was the neoplastic progression rate of Barrett's esophagus with intestinal metaplasia to high-grade dysplasia/esophageal adenocarcinoma. Secondary outcomes included cancer stage and disease-specific mortality, risk factors for progression and progression rate in patients with Barrett's esophagus with only gastric metaplasia or irregular z-line and intestinal metaplasia (IZL-IM).

resultsA total of 1932 patients were recruited, of which 969 were included in the primary analysis with a median follow-up of 5.8 years. Of these, 109 developed high-grade dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma with a progression rate of 1.63%/year. Overall, 48 patients received an esophageal adenocarcinoma diagnosis, of which 89,5% (43/48) had stage 1%, and 0.3% patients (3/969) had disease-specific mortality. Multivariate analysis showed that age, alcohol consumption, esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus length, hiatus hernia length, low-grade dysplasia and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio were risk factors for progression. The rate of progression in patients with Barrett's esophagus-gastric metaplasia or IZL-IM was 0.06%/year.

conclusionsEndoscopic surveillance in an expert Barrett's esophagus center leads to a high neoplastic progression rate, and a low rate of disease-specific mortality. Further research to correlate disease-specific mortality and cancer stage with dysplasia detection rate is warranted to develop diagnostic quality indicators specific for Barrett's esophagus.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBarrett EsophagusEsophageal NeoplasmsAgedBiopsyDisease ProgressionEsophagoscopyEsophagusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPrecancerous ConditionsProspective StudiesBarrett's esophagusesophageal adenocarcinomahigh‐grade dysplasiaintestinal metaplasia

Identifiers

PMID39949075
PMCPMC11975633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.