ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Intranasal diamorphine population pharmacokinetics modeling and simulation in pediatric breakthrough pain.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction of a curated human pharmacokinetics database for molecular fragment analysis and machine learning applications.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2026Article
- Intranasal diamorphine population pharmacokinetics modeling and simulation in pediatric breakthrough pain.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intranasal diamorphine (IND), approved for managing breakthrough pain in the UK, has been identified as an acceptable alternative offering effective, expedient, and less traumatic analgesia for children. However, the current dose regimen in pediatric populations relies on clinical expertise while the pharmacokinetics properties are poorly understood. This study aimed to develop diamorphine population pharmacokinetics (pop-PK) models and simulate the IND dosing in virtual pediatric subjects. An integrated four-compartment pop-PK model with first-order absorption and elimination provided an appropriate fit and characterized publicly available 385 concentration measurements of diamorphine, 6-monoacetylmorphine, and morphine collected from adults. Body weight allometry and renal function maturation (age) were incorporated into the final model, serving as two covariates. The estimated IND relative bioavailability was around 52% compared with intramuscularly injected diamorphine. Using this final model, the morphine plasma concentrations, as the active metabolite for pain relief, were simulated in virtual subjects. The utility of model extrapolation was supported by external verification with acceptable average fold errors of 1.06 ± 0.30 and 0.83 ± 0.07 for morphine maximum concentration and exposures. Meanwhile, the simulated morphine concentration-time profiles could recover the PK profiles observed in children after a single dose of IND. The model-based dosing simulations were therefore assessed in four children age groups to match the therapeutic window of morphine concentrations in steady state (10-20 μg/L). Our study demonstrates that the dose regimen of 0.3 mg/kg loading dose plus 0.1 mg/kg hourly maintenance dose is generally appropriate for multiple pediatric populations with breakthrough pain, in the view of PK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.