ArticleJournal of sleep research2025
Validation of manually scored multichannel frontal electroencephalography against polysomnography in a paediatric cohort.
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thoracoabdominal Asynchrony in Healthy Children.Journal of sleep research · 2026Article
- Validation of manually scored multichannel frontal electroencephalography against polysomnography in a paediatric cohort.Journal of sleep research · 2025Article
- Validation of a Wireless, Self-Applied Device for Sleep Recording in the Paediatric Population.Nature and science of sleep · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polysomnography is the only internationally recognized method to diagnose paediatric obstructive sleep apnea, thus, simpler and more cost-effective diagnostic tools are urgently needed. This study aimed to validate the manual scoring of frontal self-applicable electroencephalography against polysomnography in a paediatric cohort. The polysomnography and the frontal electroencephalography were simultaneously recorded for 1 night (n = 102) in 10-13-year-old children. Scoring was performed according to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine rules, with minor adjustments to the frontal electroencephalography. Manual scorings of sleep stages were compared in an epoch-by-epoch manner using Cohen's kappa (κ) and confusion matrices using three different models: the three-stage (wake/non-rapid eye movement/rapid eye movement), the four-stage (wake/sleep stage 1 + sleep stage 2/deep sleep Stage 3/rapid eye movement) and the five-stage model (wake/sleep stage 1/sleep stage 2/deep sleep Stage 3/rapid eye movement). The inter-scorer agreements were assessed, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was used for common sleep variables: total sleep time, wake after sleep onset, sleep efficiency, sleep-onset latency and arousal index. Cohen's κ values for the three-stage, four-stage and five-stage models were 0.85, 0.73 and 0.70, respectively. The agreement for the sleep variables studied ranged from 0.87 to 0.99. The inter-rater agreement (n = 10) was κ = 0.78 for the polysomnography and κ = 0.70 for the frontal electroencephalography. Sleep staging from the frontal electroencephalography was comparable to that of a standard polysomnography in a paediatric cohort, and showed promising results in estimating sleep time and sleep architecture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.