ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025
Corneal Ring Infiltrate Following Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reduced Accommodation Without Mydriasis After Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation in a Young Congenital Glaucoma Patient: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- Scleral Rupture with Uveal Prolapse Following Trivial Trauma in an Eye Previously Treated with Internal and External Cyclodestructive Procedures: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND We report a case of neurotrophic keratopathy (NK) following micropulse cyclophotocoagulation (MP-CPC), presenting as a ring infiltrate. We describe this clinical presentation after MP-CPC with diagnostic challenges. We provide an approach to how a proper diagnosis was reached and highlight the importance of preoperative assessment of corneal surface health in patients at risk. CASE REPORT A 36-year-old diabetic woman was referred to our cornea clinic for a new onset of a ring infiltrate in her right eye, after undergoing MP-CPC for an uncontrolled neovascular glaucoma. She had no pain or discharge, but was bothered by photophobia. After obtaining a proper medical history, best corrected visual acuity was 3/200 in the affected eye, corneal sensitivity was reduced, and slit lamp examination showed a large inferior corneal epithelial defect with a peripheral anterior stromal ring infiltrate. Corneal scrapings were obtained and differential diagnoses were excluded until a proper diagnosis of NK was reached. As conservative medical treatment with prophylactic antibiotics and frequent lubricating eye drops failed to achieve complete healing of the epithelial defect, amniotic membrane grafting was performed and resulted in complete healing with residual corneal scarring. CONCLUSIONS Neurotrophic keratopathy presenting as a corneal ring infiltrate can be confused with infectious keratitis and result in diagnostic challenges. As cases of NK after MP-CPC are more frequently reported, a routine preoperative assessment of corneal sensation is recommended, especially in patients at risk, such as diabetics. Preoperative counselling, customized treatment protocols such as shortening the treatment time, and close monitoring of postoperative ocular surface health should be implemented following MP-CPC to prevent the occurrence of serious ocular complications such as corneal scarring, melting, or perforation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.