Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39949032›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe2025

Development of Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Integration of Generative AI in University Education Through a Multidisciplinary, Consensus-Based Approach.

Loizos Symeou, Loucas Louca, Argyro Kavadella, James Mackay, Yianna Danidou, Violetta Raffay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Impact on Dental Education and Curriculum: A Systematic Review Following PRISMA Guidelines.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Recommendations for Enhancing Oral Health Professional Education Through the Student Voice: The ADEE-EDSA Partnership in Action.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Loizos SymeouEuropean University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0003-4903-4634
Loucas LoucaEuropean University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-2551-7829
Argyro KavadellaEuropean University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID 0009-0003-0560-8373
James MackayEuropean University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-7143-846X
Yianna DanidouEuropean University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0003-1722-9701
Violetta RaffayEuropean University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-4915-5658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe introduction highlights the transformative impact of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) on higher education (HE), emphasising its potential to enhance student learning and instructor efficiency while also addressing significant challenges such as accuracy, privacy, and ethical concerns. By exploring the benefits and risks of AI integration, the introduction underscores the urgent need for evidence-based, inclusive, and adaptable frameworks to guide universities in leveraging GenAI responsibly and effectively in academic environments.

aimsThis paper presents a comprehensive process for developing cross-disciplinary and consensus-based guidelines, based on the latest evidence for the integration of GenAI at European University Cyprus (EUC). In response to the rapid adoption of AI tools such as LLMs in HE, a task group at EUC created a structured framework to guide the ethical and effective use of GenAI in academia, one that was intended to be flexible enough to incorporate new developments and not infringe on instructors' academic freedoms, while also addressing ethical and practical concerns.

resultsThe framework development was informed by extensive literature reviews and consultations. Key pillars of the framework include: addressing the risks and opportunities presented by GenAI; promoting transparent communication; ensuring responsible use by students and educators; safeguarding academic integrity. The guidelines emphasise the balance between, on the one hand, leveraging AI to enhance educational experiences, and, on the other maintaining critical thinking and originality. The framework also includes practical recommendations for AI usage, classroom integration, and policy formulation, ensuring that AI augments rather than replaces human judgement in educational settings.

conclusionsThe iterative development process, including the use of GenAI tools for refining the guidelines, illustrates a hands-on approach to AI adoption in HE, and the resulting guidelines may serve as a model for other higher education institutions (HEIs) aiming to integrate AI tools while upholding educational quality and ethical standards.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGuidelines as TopicConsensusCurriculumHumansUniversitiesAIartificial intelligenceChatGPTconsensusguidelineshigher educationlarge language modelsuniversity education

Identifiers

PMID39949032
PMCPMC12006702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.