Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39948754›Full record

ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2025

Exploring healthcare professionals' attitudes to screening for disordered eating in type 1 diabetes.

Katie Fitzgerald, Christina Jones, Helen Partridge, Lindsey Rouse, Rose-Marie Satherley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Exploring healthcare professionals' attitudes to screening for disordered eating in type 1 diabetes.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katie FitzgeraldDepartment of Psychological Interventions, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Christina JonesDepartment of Psychological Interventions, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3672-6631
Helen PartridgeRoyal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust - Bournemouth Diabetes and Endocrine Centre, Bournemouth, UK.
Lindsey RouseRoyal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust - Bournemouth Diabetes and Endocrine Centre, Bournemouth, UK.
Rose-Marie SatherleyDepartment of Psychological Interventions, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7535-2292

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsEating disorders and disordered eating behaviours are prevalent among adults with type 1 diabetes, making early identification essential for improving health outcomes. Although screening tools exist to detect disordered eating in type 1 diabetes (T1DE), their application in clinical practice remains limited. This study investigates healthcare professionals' perspectives and attitudes towards screening for disordered eating in adult diabetes services. METHODOLOGY: This qualitative study employed semi-structured interviews with 13 healthcare professionals from adult diabetes services. Purposive sampling was used to ensure a broad range of healthcare professional viewpoints. The interviews centred on their perceptions of screening for disordered eating in type 1 diabetes.

resultsReflexive thematic analysis was used to identify four themes: (1) Uncertainty and Inevitabiltiy of T1DE: 'A bit of a black hole', (2) Asking about T1DE: 'My fear is…am I overstepping the line', (3) Patient-provider relationships: 'A backward step', and (4) Lack of support for T1DE: 'Where do you go?'. While healthcare professionals recognised the link between diabetes management and disordered eating, they lacked confidence in screening for these challenges due to limited time and the scarcity of specialist disordered eating resources for type 1 diabetes.

conclusionThis study highlights the challenges healthcare professionals face in screening for disordered eating in type 1 diabetes. By highlighting the need for enhanced training and clear clinical guidelines, this research suggests pathways to improve healthcare professional confidence in addressing these critical conversations with patients, ultimately supporting better health outcomes.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Feeding and Eating DisordersHealth PersonnelMass ScreeningAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchdisordered eatinggood health and well‐beingqualitativetype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID39948754
PMCPMC12006562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.