Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39948686›Full record

ArticleJournal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists2025

Longevity of terminal abutment teeth retaining maxillary obturator prostheses.

Tintu Chandy, Annu Singh, Akriti Mishra Meza, Elyn Riedel, Joseph M Huryn, Joseph D Randazzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tintu ChandyDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4349-7419
Annu SinghDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7066-4492
Akriti Mishra MezaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3477-5037
Elyn RiedelDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Joseph M HurynDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7130-6264
Joseph D RandazzoDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2080-5063

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the longevity of terminal abutment teeth retaining maxillary obturator prostheses. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a retrospective study of patients who underwent maxillectomy followed by delivery of definitive obturator prostheses between 1994 and 2020. Details on patient demographics, primary tumor, and radiation therapy were collected. The tooth closest to the defect was identified as the terminal abutment, and information such as tooth type, condition of tooth at the time of maxillectomy, Aramany classification, and cause of abutment loss were noted from the dental charts. Survival time of the terminal abutment tooth was calculated from the date of maxillectomy to the last dental follow-up visit or the date of abutment loss. Univariate analyses were performed to test for the association between survival time and each of the four covariates.

resultsIn the 26-year study period, 148 teeth in 130 patients met the inclusion criteria. Ninety-eight (66.2%) terminal abutment teeth survived, and 50 (33.8%) were lost. Squamous cell carcinoma was the leading tumor diagnosis (51%). Aramany Class II was the most predominant arch configuration (51%). The majority of the terminal abutment teeth were maxillary incisors (43%). The chief cause of terminal abutment loss was bone loss and mobility (46%). The 10-year survival probability was 65%. Radiation therapy did not statistically contribute to terminal abutment loss. Terminal abutment teeth with dental treatment showed higher failure than those without any prior treatment or dental disease.

conclusionClinicians must be aware of the various factors affecting the survival of terminal abutment teeth which can ultimately affect the success of the maxillary obturator prostheses.

Indexed as

Dental AbutmentsDental Restoration FailurePalatal ObturatorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMaxillaMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesabutmentlongevitymaxillectomyobturator

Identifiers

PMID39948686
PMCPMC13215452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.