ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2025
What can simulation educators learn from the reluctant participant? An exploration of the factors influencing engagement amongst adult learners participating in paediatric simulation training.
Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSimulation educators are typically passionate advocates for simulation as a training modality; however, we frequently encounter participants who do not share our enthusiasm. The voice of the highly engaged participant is well publicised; however, the experience of those who do not readily engage in simulation has not been extensively studied and may offer valuable insights for educators. This qualitative study will explore factors which influence learner engagement in paediatric simulation training, informing the practice and approach of simulation educators to optimise learning experiences.
methodsWe conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of 12 semi-structured interviews with medical and nursing professionals from a large paediatric teaching hospital in New Zealand who self-identified as reluctant participants in simulation-based education. Interviews explored factors which have influenced their engagement in simulation-based education over the course of their careers.
resultsThree overarching themes were developed which describe the factors influencing adult-learner engagement in simulation-based education. The first, participant anxiety, explores the participants' narratives related to anxiety before, during and even following simulation which can impact on their ability to engage in current and subsequent simulation-based education. The second, protective behaviours, relates to the defensive mechanisms employed by participants in response to vulnerability experienced during simulation activities. The third theme, perception of the facilitator, examines the impact of simulation facilitator characteristics and behaviours on learner engagement.
conclusionsThese narratives highlighted that regular simulation activities with transparent learning objectives in which facilitators demonstrate vulnerability and adopt a co-learner attitude act to reduce participant anxiety. Emergent defensive behaviours, particularly "group shielding", interfere with collective learner engagement and should be both recognised and addressed by facilitators. Finally, there are potential discrepancies in the perceptions of facilitators and learners regarding what constitutes psychologically safe education environments. A collaborative and iterative approach to simulation-based education design may act to improve psychological safety for reluctant participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.