ArticleRespiratory research2025
A pilot study of endobronchial repairment for bronchopleural fistulas.
Article in Respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and management of bronchopleural fistula after pulmonary resection (2026 edition).Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Bronchopleural fistula after lobectomy: retrospective study of different treatment solutions.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBronchopleural fistulas (BPFs) are severe medical condition with high mortality. When the conventional surgical therapy failed, endobronchial intervention could function as the supplementary option. Several studies reported successful endobronchial managements of BPFs whereas the optimal strategies remain elusive.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with BPFs underwent endobronchial interventions with Vaseline gauze, shape-adjustable silicone plug, sutured silicone tube or covered metallic stent in our institution.
resultsFrom 2018 to 2024, a total of 30 patients (11 females VS. 19 males; mean age 48.03 ± 20.33 years) with primary etiology of tumor (n = 19), empyema (n = 6), gastro-bronchial fistula (n = 1), lung infection with immune suppressed status (n = 1) and spontaneous pneumothorax (n = 3) were treated. Different occlusive materials were placed including covered metallic stent (n = 6), shape-adjustable silicone plug (n = 4), sutured silicone tube (n = 1) and Vaseline gauze(s) (n = 21). The dislocation of devices occurred in two patients with covered metallic stent occlusion. On the first day post procedure, 17 patients (56.7%) had complete resolution of the fistulas, compared with 13 patients (43.3%) had incomplete resolution. At the end of the first week post procedure, 19 patients (63.3%) showed complete resolution and 10 patients (33.3%) with partial resolution, whereas one patient (3.3%) failed to have effective closure of the fistula. The representative computer tomography images showed the closure of fistulas and ameliorated hydropneumothorax.
conclusionFour endobronchial interventional maneuvers, the Vaseline gauze, shape-adjustable silicone plug, sutured silicone tube and covered metallic stent, showed both safe and effective managements for patients with BPFs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.