ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2025
Blood biomarker fingerprints in a cohort of patients with CHRNE-related congenital myasthenic syndrome.
Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pragmatic Phenotype-Electrophysiology-Genomics Integration in Pediatric Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes: Insights From 36 Patients in a Single-Center Study in China.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Exploring molecular signatures in PURA syndrome using muscle proteomics and serum biomarkers.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mutations in CHRNE encoding the epsilon subunit of acetylcholine receptor result in impaired neuromuscular transmission and congenital myasthenic syndrome (CMS) with variying severity of symptoms. Although the pathophysiology is well-known, blood biomarker signatures enabling a patient-stratification are lacking. This retrospective two-center-study includes 19 recessive CHRNE-patients (AChR deficiency; mean age 14.8 years) from 13 families which were clinically characterized according to disease severity. 15 patients were classified as mildly and 4 patients as moderate to severely affected. Seven known pathogenic and one unreported variant (c.1032 + 2_1032 + 3delinsGT) were identified. Biomarker discovery was carried out on blood samples: proteomics was performed on white blood cells (WBC; n = 12) and on extracellular vesicles (EV) purified from serum samples (n = 7) in addition to amino acid profiling (n = 9) and miRNA screening (n = 18). For miRNA studies, 7 patients with other CMS-subtypes were moreover included. WBC-proteomics unveiled a significant increase of 7 and a decrease of 36 proteins. In silico studies of these proteins indicated affection of secretory granules and the extracellular space. Comparison across patients unveiled increase of two vesicular transport proteins (SCAMP2 and SNX2) in severely affected patients and indeed EV-proteomics revealed increase of 7 and decrease of 13 proteins. Three of these proteins (TARSH, ATRN & PLEC) are known to be important for synaptogenesis and synaptic function. Metabolomics showed decrease of seven amino acids/ amino acid metabolites (aspartic and glutamic acids, phosphoserine, amino adipate, citrulline, ornithine, and 1-methyhistidine). miRNA-profiling showed increase miR - 483 - 3p, miR-365a-3p, miR - 365b - 3p and miR-99a, and decrease of miR-4433b-3p, miR-6873-3p, miR-182-5p and let-7b-5p in CHRNE-patients whereas a comparison with other CMS subtypes showed increase of miR - 205 - 5p, miR - 10b - 5p, miR-125a-5p, miR-499-5p, miR-3120-5p and miR - 483 - 5p and decrease of miR - 1290. Our combined data introduce a molecular fingerprint on protein, metabolic and miRNA level with some of those playing different roles along the neuromuscular axis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.