Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39948616›Full record

ArticleBioelectronic medicine2025

In vivo electrophysiology recordings and computational modeling can predict octopus arm movement.

Nitish Satya Sai Gedela, Ryan D Radawiec, Sachin Salim, Julianna Richie, Cynthia Chestek, Anne Draelos, Galit Pelled

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioelectronic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nitish Satya Sai GedelaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Ryan D RadawiecDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Sachin SalimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Julianna RichieDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Cynthia ChestekDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Anne DraelosDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Adraelos@umich.edu.
Galit PelledDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. Pelledga@msu.edu.

Funding

Circuit dynamics of sensorimotor integration and decision making in octopusUF1NS115817 · NINDS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PELLED, GALIT · 2020 to 2020
$2.3M
NINDS NIH HHS UF1 NS115817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The octopus has many features that make it advantageous for revealing principles of motor circuits and control and predicting behavior. Here, an array of carbon electrodes providing single-unit electrophysiology recordings were implanted into the octopus anterior nerve cord. The number of spikes and arm movements in response to stimulation at different locations along the arm were recorded. We observed that the number of spikes occurring within the first 100 ms after stimulation were predictive of the resultant movement response. Machine learning models showed that temporal electrophysiological features could be used to predict whether an arm movement occurred with 88.64% confidence, and if it was a lateral arm movement or a grasping motion with 75.45% confidence. Both supervised and unsupervised methods were applied to gain streaming measurements of octopus arm movements and how their motor circuitry produces rich movement types in real time. For kinematic analysis, deep learning models and unsupervised dimensionality reduction identified a consistent set of features that could be used to distinguish different types of arm movements. The neural circuits and the computational models identified here generated predictions for how to evoke a particular, complex movement in an orchestrated sequence for an individual motor circuit. This study demonstrates how real-time motor behaviors can be predicted and distinguished, contributing to the development of brain-machine interfaces. The ability to accurately model and predict complex movement patterns has broad implications for advancing technologies in robotics, neuroprosthetics, and artificial intelligence, paving the way for more sophisticated and adaptable systems.

Indexed as

BionicsGraspingMotor controlNeuroprostheticsOctopus

Identifiers

PMID39948616
PMCPMC11827351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.