Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39948612›Full record

SynthesisReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2025

The role of different LNG-IUS therapies in the management of adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Biyun Zhang, Jinghua Shi, Zhiyue Gu, Yushi Wu, Xiaoyan Li, Chenyu Zhang, Hailan Yan, Qiutong Li, Shiqing Lyu, Yi Dai and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Treatment selection for adenomyosis based on imaging findings and patient characteristics.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Biyun ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jinghua ShiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhiyue GuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yushi WuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyan LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Chenyu ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Hailan YanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Qiutong LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Shiqing LyuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yi DaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jinhua LengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. lengjenny@vip.sina.com.

Funding

National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2022-PUMCH-B-085National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFC2704000National Natural Science Foundation of China 86071628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo summarize evidence on the efficacy and safety of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in managing adenomyosis (AM), both as a monotherapy and in combination with other therapies.

methodsWe searched Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System On-Line: Medline, The Cochrane Library, Embase, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang from the inception to Aug 12, 2024 for articles using the LNG-IUS both alone and combined with other therapies in patients with AM. The primary outcome included dysmenorrhea, menstrual bleeding, uterine volume, endometrial thickness and quality of life. The secondary outcome was the assessment of adverse events. Data synthesis was conducted using random-effects model with significant heterogeneity (I

resultsThe final analysis included 28 studies. Compared with etonogestrel, LNG-IUS was more effective in reducing uterine volume and associated with a lower risk of weight gain, but showed no significant difference in reducing dysmenorrhea and endometrial thickness. Comparing LNG-IUS with mifepristone, there was no significant difference in terms of quality of life. The combination of LNG-IUS with Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) was more effective than LNG-IUS alone, providing benefits in reducing dysmenorrhea (mean deviation, MD: -1.14), menstrual bleeding (MD: -11.94), uterine volume (MD: -30.39), endometrial thickness (MD: -0.89), and adverse events. The combination of LNG-IUS with surgical excision was more effective than surgical excision alone, providing benefits in reducing dysmenorrhea (MD: -1.49), menstrual bleeding (MD: -5.13) at 12 months, reducing uterine volume at 6 (MD: -9.23), 12 (MD: -16.53) and 24 (MD: -27.17) months. The combination of LNG-IUS with focused ultrasound ablation (FUA) was more effective than FUA alone, providing benefits in reducing dysmenorrhea (MD: -0.62), menstrual bleeding (MD: 0.17).

conclusionsThis study found no clear evidence to recommend single-drug therapy for improving pain and quality of life in AM management within 12 months. Combining LNG-IUS with GnRH-a is effective in alleviating pain, controlling heavy bleeding, reducing lesion volume, reducing the probability of expulsion and irregular bleeding. Postoperative LNG-IUS helps reduce long-term pain and bleeding. In combined FUA, LNG-IUS is effective for managing short-term pain and bleeding.

trial registrationPROSPERO registration number: CRD42024578824.

Indexed as

AdenomyosisIntrauterine Devices, MedicatedLevonorgestrelContraceptive Agents, FemaleDysmenorrheaFemaleHumansQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeContraceptive Agents, FemaleLevonorgestrelAdenomyosisEfficiencyLNG-IUSSafetyTreatment

Identifiers

PMID39948612
PMCPMC11823221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.