Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39948604›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Navigating care and communication: a qualitative study on nurses' perspectives in response centres.

Camilla Anker-Hansen, Elsie Kristin Johansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Camilla Anker-HansenFaculty of Health, Welfare, and Organisation, Østfold University College, P.O. Box 700, Halden, 1757, Norway. camilla.anker-hansen@hiof.no.
Elsie Kristin JohansenFaculty of Health, Welfare, and Organisation, Østfold University College, P.O. Box 700, Halden, 1757, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing recommendations from the Norwegian Directorate of Health, there has been an emphasis on social alarms with associated response services in Norwegian municipalities. The aim is to enable older persons to live in their own homes for as long as possible, optimise resource utilisation, and enhance the quality of municipal health and care services. However, there is limited knowledge about nurses' experiences at response centres and the content of conversations between patients and nurses after an alarm is triggered. Understanding these interactions is crucial for optimising telecare services and improving patient outcomes. PURPOSE: To explore nurses' experiences of nurse-patient interactions after triggered social alarms at response centres located in Norwegian municipalities.

methodThis study employed a qualitative research design involving semi-structured interviews with five nurses at two different response centres in Norway. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.

resultsThe study identified three key categories related to nurses' experiences in response centres. First, nurses emphasised the importance of clinical expertise and patient familiarity in ensuring safety, highlighting that their experience and familiarity with patients were essential for delivering safe care during remote interactions. Second, decision-making processes were challenging, as nurses were responsible for assessing appropriate care levels and faced the demanding task of making critical decisions. Lastly, communication barriers posed significant challenges, including variations in practice standards, vague explanations from patients, and technological limitations. Together, these categories reflect the latent theme of clinical judgment and managing uncertainty in practice, reflecting how nurses navigate the complexities of decision-making, accountability, and patient safety.

conclusionThis study contributes new insights into the role of nurses at response centres in ensuring patient safety, particularly in navigating complexities of remote decision-making. This study sheds light on nurses' experiences in ensuring patient safety, emphasizing their strong sense of responsibility and the importance of clinical experience in managing complex remote decision-making scenarios. It also highlights the challenges they face, including the challenge of making accurate decisions often based on vague patient descriptions and technological communication challenges.

trial registrationNot applicable to the study.

Indexed as

NursingQualitativeRemote careResponse centresSocial alarmTelecareWelfare technology

Identifiers

PMID39948604
PMCPMC11827251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.