ArticleBMC medical education2025
Comparison of face-to-face teaching and online teaching in neurosurgery education for medical students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and evaluation of a case-based learning program integrated with the BOPPPS model in neurosurgical residency training: a prospective controlled educational study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- How effective is online teaching of physiology modules? perception of Rwandan health sciences students.Current research in physiology · 2026Article
- Pedagogical strategies for specialised coursework postgraduate programmes in optometry: a mixed methods study for South Africa.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Face-to-face" is not superior to "face-to-screen": comparing effects of online and offline communication skills course in postgraduate medical students.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Integrating Standardized Patient into Case-Based Learning in Posterior Fossa Meningioma Teaching: Evaluating the Added Value Beyond Case-Based Learning Alone.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveOnline teaching has been confirmed as an effective method for maintaining educational quality in many courses. However, it remains unclear whether the teaching effectiveness of face-to-face teaching can be achieved in neurosurgery clinical courses. In this study, we aim to analyze the effect of online teaching on neurosurgery by comparing it with traditional face-to-face teaching and investigating the students' willingness to engage with online teaching, as well as their evaluations of this mode of teaching.
methodsWe randomly selected three classes of fourth year medical students who received online teaching and three classes of fourth year medical students who received face-to-face teaching. After completing the neurosurgery curriculum, the study examined the differences between the two groups in terms of satisfaction with the course, theoretical knowledge, and clinical practice abilities, which included medical history inquiry, physical examination, diagnosis, and treatment. In the online teaching setting, a survey was conducted to assess the students' willingness to accept online teaching and to identify its shortcomings.
resultsThe self-evaluation items included learning motivation, learning more targeted and more interestingly, clinical thinking ability, clinician-patient communication skills, and teamwork skills. All of these aspects were significantly better in the face-to-face group compared to the online group. Each item's score for clinical practice abilities in the face-to-face group was notably higher than that of the online group. Students' satisfaction with and evaluation of the effectiveness of online teaching were lower than those of face-to-face teaching. The primary drawback of online teaching is the lack of a traditional classroom atmosphere, followed by limited interaction with teachers and classmates.
conclusionsThe face-to-face group had better self-evaluation and clinical practice abilities than the online group. Additionally, students expressed a preference for face-to-face teaching of neurosurgery clinical courses. The absence of a traditional classroom atmosphere is the main drawback of online teaching. Therefore, online teaching cannot completely replace traditional face-to-face teaching in neurosurgery clinical courses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.