ArticleWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2025
A risk prediction model for venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with thoracic trauma: a machine learning, national multicenter retrospective study.
Article in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning prediction models for deep vein thrombosis in hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Venous Thromboembolism Prevention: A Narrative Review of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Natural Language Processing.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Application of machine learning models in predicting the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Early Risk Stratification of Severe Trauma in the Emergency Department: Integrating Clinical Scoring Systems, Dynamic Biomarkers, and Artificial Intelligence-A Narrative Review.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence models for predicting pulmonary complications in patients with chest trauma: a retrospective study.Journal of trauma and injury · 2025Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in risk assessment and management of venous thromboembolism: scoping review.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Integration of Surgical and Coagulation Risk Factors for Predicting Postoperative Pulmonary Embolism in Thoracic Surgery: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly treatment and prevention are the keys to reducing the mortality of VTE in patients with thoracic trauma. This study aimed to develop and validate an automatic prediction model based on machine learning for VTE risk screening in patients with thoracic trauma.
methodsIn this national multicenter retrospective study, the clinical data of chest trauma patients hospitalized in 33 hospitals in China from October 2020 to September 2021 were collected for model training and testing. The data of patients with thoracic trauma at Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital from October 2021 to September 2022 were included for further verification. The performance of the model was measured mainly by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the mean accuracy (mAP), and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were also measured.
resultsA total of 3116 patients were included in the training and validation of the model. External validation was performed in 408 patients. The random forest (RF) model was selected as the final model, with an AUROC of 0·879 (95% CI 0·856-0·902) in the test dataset. In the external validation, the AUROC was 0.83 (95% CI 0.794-0.866), the specificity was 0.756 (95% CI 0.713-0.799), the sensitivity was 0.821 (95% CI 0.692-0.923), the negative predictive value was 0.976 (95% CI 0.958-0.993), and the positive likelihood ratio was 3.364.
conclusionsThis model can be used to quickly screen for the risk of VTE in patients with thoracic trauma. More than 90% of unnecessary VTE tests can be avoided, which can help clinicians target interventions to high-risk groups and ensure resource optimization. Although further validation and improvement are needed, this study has considerable clinical value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.