Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39948568›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2025

A risk prediction model for venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with thoracic trauma: a machine learning, national multicenter retrospective study.

Kaibin Liu, Di Qian, Dongsheng Zhang, Zhichao Jin, China Chest Injury Research Society (CCIRS), Yi Yang, Yanfang Zhao

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kaibin Liu *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Di Qian *Department of Health Statistics,Faculty of Health Service, Naval Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Dongsheng Zhang *Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Shijiazhuang Third Hospital, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei, China.
Zhichao JinDepartment of Health Statistics,Faculty of Health Service, Naval Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
China Chest Injury Research Society (CCIRS)
Yi YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200235, China. 7250012312@shsmu.edu.cn.
Yanfang ZhaoDepartment of Health Statistics,Faculty of Health Service, Naval Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai, 200433, China. zhyf715@s126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly treatment and prevention are the keys to reducing the mortality of VTE in patients with thoracic trauma. This study aimed to develop and validate an automatic prediction model based on machine learning for VTE risk screening in patients with thoracic trauma.

methodsIn this national multicenter retrospective study, the clinical data of chest trauma patients hospitalized in 33 hospitals in China from October 2020 to September 2021 were collected for model training and testing. The data of patients with thoracic trauma at Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital from October 2021 to September 2022 were included for further verification. The performance of the model was measured mainly by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the mean accuracy (mAP), and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were also measured.

resultsA total of 3116 patients were included in the training and validation of the model. External validation was performed in 408 patients. The random forest (RF) model was selected as the final model, with an AUROC of 0·879 (95% CI 0·856-0·902) in the test dataset. In the external validation, the AUROC was 0.83 (95% CI 0.794-0.866), the specificity was 0.756 (95% CI 0.713-0.799), the sensitivity was 0.821 (95% CI 0.692-0.923), the negative predictive value was 0.976 (95% CI 0.958-0.993), and the positive likelihood ratio was 3.364.

conclusionsThis model can be used to quickly screen for the risk of VTE in patients with thoracic trauma. More than 90% of unnecessary VTE tests can be avoided, which can help clinicians target interventions to high-risk groups and ensure resource optimization. Although further validation and improvement are needed, this study has considerable clinical value.

Indexed as

Machine LearningThoracic InjuriesVenous ThromboembolismAdultAgedChinaFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC CurveMachine learningRandom forestRib fractureRisk prediction modelThoracic traumaVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID39948568
PMCPMC11823207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.