ArticleBMC medical education2025
Core capabilities of Chinese centers for disease control and prevention public health personnel: a network analysis from Northeast China.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of emergency management capabilities for public health emergencies in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The relationship between Chinese medical students' learning motivation and learning engagement: a network analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the continued inadequacy of the capability of Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) public health personnel to respond effectively to emerging infectious disease outbreaks, as well as the urgent need for specific tools to assess the capability needed by CDC public health personnel in the post-pandemic era. Using network analysis, we aimed to analyze the comprehensive capacities of CDC public health staff and the relationships between these capacities. We also examined the impact of standardized public health training on their capacities and provided actionable recommendations for improving their training and overall capability.
methodsThis study employs a cross-sectional design. A self-developed questionnaire was used to evaluate the capabilities of public health personnel in CDC. Network analysis was conducted using the qgraph package in R (version 4.3.1) to construct a capability network model, while the bootnet package ensured the stability and reliability of the network through bootstrapping. The NetworkComparisonTest package was applied to compare network structures and identify differences between groups.
resultsOver half (51.80%, N = 11,912) of public health personnel rated their comprehensive capabilities as poor. Core capabilities, including research, motivation, and emergency response, were identified as pivotal within the capability network. The network stability coefficient for strength was 0.75, indicating reliable results. The capability networks of those who participated in standardized training differed significantly from those who did not (P = 0.04).
conclusionCDC public health personnel exhibit significant capability gaps, particularly in research and leadership. Standardized training provides some benefits but remains insufficient. Policymakers should address these gaps by aligning training content with critical capability needs, offering flexible and targeted training methods (e.g., virtual courses, self-paced modules), and implementing capability-based assessments to evaluate training outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.