Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39948536›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2025

Ethical issues in unprofessional behavior of residents who dispute dismissal: ten year analysis of case law in hospital-based specialties.

Judith Godschalx-Dekker, Sebastiaan Pronk, Gert Olthuis, Rankie Ten Hoopen, Walther van Mook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Judith Godschalx-DekkerDepartment of Hospital Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Flevoziekenhuis for GGZ Centraal Flevoland, Almere, The Netherlands.
Sebastiaan PronkDepartment of Intensive Care, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Gert OlthuisDepartment of IQ Health, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rankie Ten HoopenDepartment of Health Law, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Walther van MookDepartment of Intensive Care, Academy for Postgraduate Medical Training and Health Professions Education, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. w.van.mook@mumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResidents who do not internalize professional values may not be a good fit for their specialty and compromise the quality of their patient care. Research aimed at recognizing residents' shortcomings in professionalism may help to prevent future shortcomings towards patients. The aim of this study was to increase insight into residents' shortcomings in medical professionalism in light of professional values relevant within residency training.

methodsWe analyzed all law cases from the Dutch national conciliation board from 2011 to 2020 on the unprofessional behaviors described.

resultsDuring the period investigated, 61 dismissed residents challenged their dismissal. In 39 of 61 cases (64%), the program director named unprofessional behavior(s) as (one of the) reasons for dismissal. The most prevalent deficit of residents deemed unprofessional was poor self-awareness (80%); less prevalent deficits were: shortness of engagement and dishonest and disrespectful behavior (31% or less).

conclusionsWe describe perceived unprofessional behavior in residency, which was not about exceptional or abominable behaviors. For the most part, these behaviors concerned the accumulation of remediation-resistant day-to-day underperformance, discrediting trust and professional reliability. This finding encourages dedicated longitudinal assessment of professionalism and fuels the ethical debate about required professional values in hospital care.

Indexed as

Dissent and DisputesInternship and ResidencyPhysiciansProfessionalismProfessional MisconductFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsEducationOrganizational ethicsProfessional ethicsProfessional-patient relationshipRegulatory issuesUnprofessional behavior

Identifiers

PMID39948536
PMCPMC11823240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.