ArticleBMC surgery2025
Does thoracoscopic repair of type C esophageal atresia require emergency treatment?
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia (EA) with tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) has been performed with increasing frequency. Although many children have underwent surgery within three days after birth, the optimal timing for operation remains undetermined. This study aimed to investigate the appropriate timing for thoracoscopic repair of type C EA and its mid-term clinical outcomes.
methodWe retrospectively analyzed 142 patients with EA between April 2009 and April 2023. A total of 109 patients with type C EA who underwent thoracoscopic one-stage repair surgery were included. The patients were divided into two groups based on surgical timing: the early repair group (< 5 days) and the delayed repair group (≥ 5 days). Patients in the two groups were matched using propensity score matching (PSM) to eliminate the imbalance between groups caused by confounding factors such as severe cardiac complications, gestational age, and birth weight.
resultThe median age at surgery was 5 days (range: 1-16 days). After matching, 43 patients (out of 59) in the early repair group (group A) and 43 patients (out of 50) in the delayed repair group (group B) were included in the validation cohort. All cases (n = 86) successfully completed thoracoscopic one-stage repair surgery. Delayed surgery did not increase the incidence of preoperative and postoperative respiratory tract infections. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups; however, patients in group B experienced a lower frequency of balloon dilation (1.8 ± 0.8 vs. 3.1 ± 1.1, P = 0.035) for anastomotic stricture during follow-up.
conclusionsWith improvements in neonatal surveillance, appropriately delayed surgery does not increase the incidence of respiratory infections, allowing surgeons to optimize treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.