ArticleBMC medical education2025
Burnout in medical education: interventions from a co-creation process.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Burnout and Engagement Within Medical Education: A Repeated Measures Study on Their Evolution and Main Determinants.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
- Striking the balance: A deep dive into wellness and work-life harmony in orthopaedic education - A comprehensive review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe high prevalence of burnout in medical education indicates an urgent need to develop and implement effective interventions at both the individual and organisational levels. Currently, there is a shortage of studies that include perspectives from multiple stakeholders, such as medical students, trainees and university staff. Our objective is to identify and discuss interventions from various stakeholders using a bottom-up approach to guide future implementation.
methodsA co-creation methodology was adopted, including workshops and a Delphi session, engaging 96 participants. The study included 12 workshops with medical students and trainees in Flanders (Belgium): first-year bachelor students (n = 12), first-year master students (n = 13), first-year General Practice (GP) trainees (n = 14) and first-year specialist trainees (n = 39). Additionally, one Delphi session was held with 18 other relevant stakeholders, including university staff. All workshops were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed using NVivo.
resultsOur results identified interventions to prevent and mitigate burnout among medical students and trainees. On the individual level, participants discussed personalized coaching, annual health assessments and training sessions. On the organisational level, a distinction was made between interventions intended for universities, and those for hospitals and GPs involved in medical training. Six interventions focused on preventing burnout in all contexts (i.e., onboarding programs); three were meant for universities only (i.e., pass-fail system), and six were tailored for hospitals and GPs (i.e., flexibility in scheduling).
conclusionThrough an iterative multistakeholder co-creation process, this study identified interventions to prevent and mitigate burnout within medical education. These interventions span individual and organisational levels, targeting universities, hospitals and GPs. While organisational interventions are increasingly recognized as crucial to address burnout, individual-focused interventions remain predominant in current research. There is a pressing need to further investigate organisational interventions and their combination with individual-focused strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.