ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Early career midwives' experiences of development opportunities and their relation to retention and job satisfaction: an interpretative phenomenological analysis study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough continual professional development is required of all midwives, evidence suggests that a lack of opportunities to develop is contributing to midwives choosing to leave the profession. With a national shortage of midwives, it is imperative to explore factors relating to the retention and job satisfaction of midwives. This study explored the development opportunity experiences of Band 6 midwives, who make up over half of the United Kingdom midwifery workforce.
methodsThis study is aligned with interpretivism and the qualitative approach, embracing a relativist ontology and subjectivist epistemology. The chosen methodology was interpretative phenomenology and an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach was used. Seven Band 6 midwife participants, all early career midwives, were recruited from the study setting of NHS England using purposive non-probability sampling via professional networks. Data collection was performed using one-on-one in-depth semi-structured interviews. Data analysis was performed using a seven-stage interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) process and six themes were interpreted and identified: Stagnation or Adventure, A Basic or Higher Need, Awareness and Access, Interpersonal Relationships, Overlooked, Development for the Individual and the Service.
resultsThe early career Band 6 midwives perceived there to be few development opportunities, limited by a lack of awareness and access, and development opportunities were reported to strongly relate to the participants' job satisfaction and career progression. Participants discussed that their appraisals, their relationships with their managers or midwifery leaders, and their midwifery professional status were key factors affecting their access to development opportunities. Development opportunities were seen to be beneficial to the development of their own practice, the quality of their patients' care and the effectiveness of the wider maternity service.
conclusionsMidwives are highly motivated by the prospect of accessing development opportunities for their personal and professional growth but also to improve the service they can provide birthing families. Meeting the 'development needs' of midwives could be seen not only as a way to advance the ability and capability of the workforce, but also improve job satisfaction, mitigate staff attrition and aid retention of skilled practitioners in the challenging context of United Kingdom maternity services. Further research on the experience, barriers, benefits and implementation of midwifery professional development should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.