ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Effect of different incisions on dry eye symptoms after cataract surgery in diabetic patients.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimDiabetic patients suffer from severe dry eye after cataract surgery, and the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of 2.2 mm and 3.0 mm clear corneal incisions on dry eye after phacoemulsification in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
methodsClinical data of 104 patients with T2DM who underwent phacoemulsification in the Department of Ophthalmology of The People's Hospital of Yingshang from January 2022 to November 2023 were retrospectively collected. The patients were categorized into 2.2 mm and 3.0 mm groups according to the surgical incision, and their preoperative and postoperative Ocular surface disease index (OSDI), Schirmer I test (SIt), and Fluorescein breakup time (FBUT), as well as anxiety and depression levels, were analyzed.
resultsBefore surgery, mild anxiety and depression were present in both groups. At 7 days and 1 month postoperatively, OSDI was significantly higher and SIt and FBUT were substantially lower in both groups, but the above indexes were milder in the 2.2 mm group. Meanwhile, the psychological status of both groups significantly improved at 1 month after surgery, and the improvement was more significant in the 2.2 mm group. At 3 months postoperatively, the dry eye of the two groups was relieved, and the psychological status was also improved.
conclusionCompared with 3.0 mm, a 2.2 mm clear corneal incision effectively reduced dry eye after phacoemulsification in T2DM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.