Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39948447›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025

A doubly robust estimator for continuous treatments in high dimensions.

Qian Gao, Jiale Wang, Ruiling Fang, Hongwei Sun, Tong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qian GaoDepartment of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, No.56 Xinjian South Road, Taiyuan, 030001, China.
Jiale WangDepartment of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, No.56 Xinjian South Road, Taiyuan, 030001, China.
Ruiling FangDepartment of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, No.56 Xinjian South Road, Taiyuan, 030001, China.
Hongwei SunDepartment of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, China.
Tong WangDepartment of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, No.56 Xinjian South Road, Taiyuan, 030001, China. tongwang@sxmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi Province 202203021212382National Natural Science Foundation of China 82073674National Natural Science Foundation of China 82204163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneralized propensity score (GPS) methods have become popular for estimating causal relationships between a continuous treatment and an outcome in observational studies with rich covariate information. The presence of rich covariates enhances the plausibility of the unconfoundedness assumption. Nonetheless, it is also crucial to ensure the correct specification of both marginal and conditional treatment distributions, beyond the assumption of unconfoundedness.

methodWe address limitations in existing GPS methods by extending balance-based approaches to high dimensions and introducing the Generalized Outcome-Adaptive LASSO and Doubly Robust Estimate (GOALDeR). This novel approach integrates a balance-based method that is robust to the misspecification of distributions required for GPS methods, a doubly robust estimator that is robust to the misspecification of models, and a variable selection technique for causal inference that ensures an unbiased and statistically efficient estimation.

resultsSimulation studies showed that GOALDeR was able to generate nearly unbiased estimates when either the GPS model or the outcome model was correctly specified. Notably, GOALDeR demonstrated greater precision and accuracy compared to existing methods and was slightly affected by the covariate correlation structure and ratio of sample size to covariate dimension. Real data analysis revealed no statistically significant dose-response relationship between epigenetic age acceleration and Alzheimer's disease.

conclusionIn this study, we proposed GOALDeR as an advanced GPS method for causal inference in high dimensions, and empirically demonstrated that GOALDeR is doubly robust, with improved accuracy and precision compared to existing methods. The R package is available at https://github.com/QianGao-SXMU/GOALDeR .

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalPropensity ScoreAlgorithmsComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansObservational Studies as TopicTreatment OutcomeCausal inferenceDoubly robustGeneralized propensity scoreHigh-dimensional data

Identifiers

PMID39948447
PMCPMC11823051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.