Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2025
Comparing the effects of magnesium sulfate and lidocaine spray on hemodynamic changes caused by laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aims at comparing the impact of Magnesium Sulfate and Lidocaine sprays on hemodynamic changes after laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.
designThis double-blind clinical trial (code IRCT20230719058846N1) was conducted on the patients undergoing elective surgery in the city of Karaj.
methodsA total of 100 patients, aged 18 to 40 years and classified as ASA I or II, who were candidates for elective surgery, were randomly assigned to two equal groups. Prior to intubation, patients received lidocaine spray (5 puffs of Lidocaine 10%) in one group, and magnesium sulfate spray (5 puffs of Magnesium 20%) in the other. Induction of anesthesia was the same in both groups. Patients' hemodynamic statuses were measured and compared once before the intubation and also 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 min after it.
resultsBefore the intervention, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of demographic and hemodynamic variables (P < 0.05). The results showed that the systolic blood pressure at minutes 3, 5, and 7 was significantly lower among the patients receiving magnesium than those receiving lidocaine (P < 0.05). Other hemodynamic variables were not statistically different between the two groups (P < 0.05).
conclusionBased on the findings of the present study, magnesium sulfate spray is more effective than lidocaine in controlling hemodynamic complications. Therefore, it can be used to reduce hemodynamic complications following intubation. However, it may be associated with tachycardia, which needs to be taken into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.