ArticleScientific reports2025
Learning to read transforms phonological into phonographic representations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Learning to read changes the nature of speech representations. One possible change consists in transforming phonological representations into phonographic ones. However, evidence for such transformation remains surprisingly scarce. Here, we used a novel word learning paradigm to address this issue. During the learning phase, participants learned unknown words in both spoken and written forms. Following this phase, the impact of spelling knowledge on the auditory perception of the novel words was assessed at two time points through an unattended oddball paradigm, while the Mismatch Negativity component was measured by high density EEG. Immediately after the learning phase, no influence of spelling knowledge on the perception of the spoken input was found. Interestingly, one week later, this influence emerged, making similar sounding words with different spellings more distinct than similar sounding words that also shared the same spelling. Our finding provides novel neurophysiological evidence of an integration of phonological and orthographic representations that occurs once newly acquired knowledge has been consolidated. The resulting 'phonographic' representations may characterize how known words are stored in literates' mental lexicon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.