ArticleScientific reports2025
Validity and reliability of the arabic national nutrition plans checklist.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Visual WetlandBirds Dataset: Bird Species Identification and Behavior Recognition in Videos.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous efforts have been directed toward promoting nutrition in Arab countries. Implementing national nutrition plans and strategies is essential for addressing a country's nutritional situation synergistically and cost-effectively. Many Arabic-speaking countries have developed national nutrition plans and/or strategies. Thus, an Arabic national nutrition plans assessment tool is necessary to revise current plans and improve the quality of future plans in the region. This study aimed to translate and evaluate the validity and reliability of the Arabic-translated National Nutrition Plans checklist. After translating the checklist into Arabic, the Delphi technique was used to evaluate face validity using the Face Validity Index (FVI). Test-retest reliability was evaluated by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient and inter-rater reliability using Fleiss' Kappa. This resulted in acceptable face validity (FVI values > 0.83). The test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.98, SEM = 1.96, MDC = 5.43), and the inter-rater reliability achieved substantial agreement between the raters (Fleiss' kappa [95% CI] = 0.61 [0.59-0.63]). This demonstrates that the Arabic-translated National Nutrition Plans checklist is valid and reliable. The Arabic-translated National Nutrition Plans checklist lays the foundation for the systematic assessment and development of national nutrition plans and strategies in Arab countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.