Observational studyJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2025
Immediate heart rate changes in late preterm infants receiving resuscitation in the delivery room.
Observational study in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAssess heart rate (HR) trends in the minutes following delivery in late preterm infants 34-36 6/7 weeks with spontaneous respirations and compare trends in infants with delayed transition requiring interventions and assess the direct potential impact of these interventions on HR changes.
designProspective observational single center study in 20 late preterm infants born via cesarean section utilizing the NeoBeat which uses dry electrode technology to obtain blinded HR measures in infants with spontaneous respirations versus infants requiring interventions i.e.: positive pressure ventilation, continuous positive airway pressure or suctioning.
resultsInitial HR in spontaneously breathing infants (n = 8) was higher versus those requiring interventions, differences that persisted through five minutes. Iatrogenic bradycardia ranging from 65 to 90 beats/minute was induced by interventions in five(42%) of 12 infants.
conclusionsInitial HR in spontaneously breathing late preterm infants was significantly higher compared to infants who received interventions. Respiratory interventions induced sudden unanticipated bradycardia in many cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.