ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Endoscopic radial incision combined with local injection of triamcinolone acetonide for refractory esophageal stenosis after endoscopy submucosal dissection.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Refractory esophageal stenosis (RES) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is challenging in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate endoscopic radial incision (ERI) combined with the local injection of triamcinolone acetonide for RES and to assess its safety and efficacy. A total of nine patients (five males; age range: 50-76 years) who underwent ERI + triamcinolone acetonide for RES after ESD between August 2019 and November 2022 were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the duration of treatment. The length of the stenosed portion, procedure time, sessions of endoscopic therapy, effectiveness rate, success rate, dysphagia grade, complications, and quality of scores were also analyzed. The effectiveness and success rates were 100% and 88.9%, respectively. The mean number of sessions of ERI + triamcinolone acetonide was 2.2 (1.0-4.0). The mean procedure time was 25.9 ± 3.8 min. No severe complications, including bleeding or perforation, were observed during the perioperative period. Dysphagia symptoms were relieved in all patients after endoscopic treatment. Patients had significantly better functional scales for social functioning and global health status and lower rates of fatigue, gastrointestinal symptoms, and financial difficulties after treatment. ERI + triamcinolone acetonide can be considered a safe and effective treatment for RES after ESD. Larger prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm its utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39948302What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.