Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39948282›Full record

ArticleNature chemistry2025

Interface flexibility controls the nucleation and growth of supramolecular networks.

Vincenzo Caroprese, Cem Tekin, Veronika Cencen, Majid Mosayebi, Navid Asmari, Tanniemola B Liverpool, Derek N Woolfson, Georg E Fantner, Maartje M C Bastings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vincenzo Caroprese *Programmable Biomaterials Laboratory, Institute of Materials, School of Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8818-4286
Cem Tekin *Programmable Biomaterials Laboratory, Institute of Materials, School of Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Veronika Cencen *Laboratory for Bio- and Nano-Instrumentation, Interfaculty Bioengineering Institute, School of Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3070-5859
Majid MosayebiSchool of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2921-8145
Navid AsmariLaboratory for Bio- and Nano-Instrumentation, Interfaculty Bioengineering Institute, School of Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Tanniemola B LiverpoolSchool of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4376-5604
Derek N WoolfsonBristol BioDesign Institute, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-3202
Georg E FantnerLaboratory for Bio- and Nano-Instrumentation, Interfaculty Bioengineering Institute, School of Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5889-3022
Maartje M C BastingsProgrammable Biomaterials Laboratory, Institute of Materials, School of Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. maartje.bastings@epfl.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7603-4018

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 773091EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (H2020 Excellent Science - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions) 754354Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) 200021_182562Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) PCEGP2_181137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supramolecular networks are abundantly present in nature and, like crystalline materials, often develop from an initial nucleation site, followed by growth based on directional interactions between components. Traditionally, the binding strength and directionality of interactions is thought to dictate nucleation and crystal growth, whereas structural flexibility favours defects. Usually, macromonomers present multiple binding sites with relative intramolecular flexibility, but the effects of such flexibility on regulating network formation have been given little attention. Here we introduce the concept of 'interface flexibility' and demonstrate its critical importance in the nucleation and growth of supramolecular networks. As a model system, we use trisymmetric DNA-based macromonomers, which organize into hexagonal networks through weak π-π interactions at their tips. The directional nature and low spatial tolerance of π-π interactions mean that small shifts in orientation have a large effect on effective valency. We show that too much interface flexibility disrupts network formation, regardless of affinity. Tuning the interface flexibility greatly expands the available design space for synthetic supramolecular materials.

Identifiers

PMID39948282
PMCPMC11882452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.