ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2025
AI-based tumor-stroma ratio quantification algorithm: comprehensive evaluation of prognostic role in primary colorectal cancer.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A scoping review of TSR analysis in colorectal cancer: implications for automated solutions.Oncology reviews · 2025Pooled it
- An agentic framework for autonomous scientific discovery in cancer pathology.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- [Artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostics in the pathology of internal and oncological diseases].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Digital Pathology and the AI-Based Quantification of the Tumor Microenvironment in Gastrointestinal Cancer: From Tumor Budding and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes to Tertiary Lymphoid Structures.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into colorectal cancer reporting.The Journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Automating tumor-stroma ratio quantification in colon cancer patients from the UNITED study.ESMO open · 2026Article
- Computer-aided quantitative stromal analysis: a comprehensive investigation of its prognostic significance in lung squamous cell carcinoma.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Similarity-guided swarm of models: enhancing semi-supervised learning in computational pathology.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Automated tumor-stroma ratio estimation for improved prognostic stratification of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumor-stroma ratio (TSR quantification in primary colorectal cancer is an important prognostic parameter, with stroma-rich tumors considered to have an unfavorable prognosis. Earlier studies involved relevant region selection and TSR quantification by human analysts, who are prone to interobserver variability. The aim of the current study was to develop a fully automated, quantitative algorithm for TSR analysis based on precise segmentation of H&E-stained histological tissue sections. The TSR quantification algorithm was developed based on the segmentation backbone, allowing accurate pixel-wise mapping of all relevant tissue classes (n = 12), including tumor cells, tumoral stroma, necrosis, and mucin. Three well-characterized cohorts of patients with stage I-IV primary operable colorectal cancer and available digital H&E histological slides were included (n = 548, n = 147, and n = 622, respectively). Three sizes of area for TSR analysis were tested (1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mm). The maximal TSR value per case was used for prognostic analysis involving different clinical endpoints. Regional heterogeneity of TSR was high in most tumors, with the algorithm effectively finding the most relevant region for analysis. Maximal case-level TSR values depended on the size of the area for analysis, which also significantly influences the prognostic performance of the TSR and must be a matter of standardization. In Cox analysis, an analytical size of 1 mm allowed the best performance, with an independent prognostic role retained in the context of other pathological variables for progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival endpoints. A powerful, fully automated, fully quantitative, objective tool for TSR assessment in primary colorectal cancer was developed and validated to have independent prognostic value. Standardization of TSR quantification is important given that analytical parameters can substantially influence the prognostic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39948241What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.