ReviewCEN case reports2025
Delayed rectum perforation by a peritoneal dialysis catheter in a peritoneal dialysis patient: a case report and literature review.
Review in CEN case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 60-year-old woman with diabetic nephropathy was diagnosed with end-stage kidney disease and underwent peritoneal dialysis (PD) (X-3 years). Due to decreased residual renal function, she commenced combined PD and hemodialysis (HD) for 6 h once a week (Jan. X year). Seven months later, she visited her maintenance dialysis facility because of fluid leakage from the pubic region and abdominal pain during the dialysate infusion. Tests of the leakage fluid revealed a high glucose concentration, leading to discontinuation of PD and transfer to HD three times a week. She had been referred to a general hospital in her city, where vesical and uterine fistulas were excluded. Consequently, she was referred to our department to investigate the cause of the leakage. She was diagnosed with peritonitis by a physician and was receiving treatment. The lumen of the PD catheter was brownish, indicating possible contamination, leading us to plan its removal. At the time of catheter removal, laparoscopy and intraoperative lower gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a rectal perforation at the tip of the PD catheter; this was removed after suturing the damaged area. This was a rare case of delayed perforation of the rectum by a PD catheter, during combined PD and HD therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.