ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Value of Post-NAC CT-based Node-RADS score for Predicting residual lymph node metastasis and survival outcome of locally advanced gastric cancer.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic value of pretherapy CT-based Node-RADS for overall survival in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer treated with chemoimmunotherapy: a comparison with clinical N staging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance of Node-RADS in assessing regional lymph node metastasis and prognosis in resected gastric cancer.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe Node Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) provides structured and effective evaluation for lymph nodes in malignancies. This study aims to investigate its value in predicting residual lymph node metastasis (LNM) and survival outcome of locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 118 patients with LAGC underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and gastrectomy from April 2015 to June 2020. The diagnostic performance of the post-NAC CT-based Node-RADS score for regional LNM, both at the patient level and at the perigastric/extragastric subgroup level, was estimated using area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Youden's index. Kaplan-Meier curve was employed for prognostic analyses between high/low Node-RADS score group. A predictive Node-RADS (NR) model for LNM was developed using logistic regression analyses and a prognostic NR model for overall survival (OS) was developed using Cox regression analyses.
resultsIn the prediction of LNM, the Node-RADS score exhibited an AUC of 0.843 (95%CI: 0.765-0.921) at patient level, 0.838 (95%CI: 0.757-0.918) in perigastric subgroup and 0.813 (95%CI: 0.724-0.901) in extragastric subgroup, surpassing LN short-axis criteria (AUC:0.664 [95%CI: 0.584-0.743], p < 0.001). The AUC of the NR predictive model for LNM increased to 0.870 (95%CI: 0.795-0.945), with 88.7% sensitivity and 78.9% specificity. The Node-RADS score was significantly correlated with post-NAC pathological status, and served as an independent indicator for OS (all p < 0.05).The NR prognostic model exhibited a Harrell's consistency index (C-index) of 0.724 (95%CI: 0.663-0.785), with no significant difference from the pathological prognostic model (0.739 [95%CI: 0.677-0.801], p = 0.695).
conclusionThe post-NAC Node-RADS score provides accurate prediction of regional LNM and shows promising prognostic value for LAGC patients. Post-NAC Node-RADS related predictive models show potential in early identification of high-risk LAGC patients with residual lymph nodes or poor prognosis after NAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39948223What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.