Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39948183›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Effects of shapes and kinematics of hovering flapping wings on aerodynamic forces and vortex structures.

Hyun Ki Kwon, Jo Won Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hyun Ki KwonDepartment of Aeronautical Science and Flight Operation, Korea Aerospace University, Goyang-Si, 10540, Republic of Korea.
Jo Won ChangDepartment of Aeronautical Science and Flight Operation, Korea Aerospace University, Goyang-Si, 10540, Republic of Korea. jwchang@kau.ac.kr.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) No. 2022R1A2C1012776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of wing shapes and flapping motions on the aerodynamic forces and vortex structures of insect flight. Aerodynamic force measurements and flow visualizations were performed in a water tank by cross-applying the wing shapes of bumblebee, hawkmoth, and hummingbird to their hovering flapping motions. When the three different wings were measured making the same motions, the average difference of lift-to-drag ratio was 2.7%. In the aspect ratio and wing area distribution range, where three wing shapes were distributed, aerodynamic performances were similar according to wing shape. However, the average difference of lift-to-drag ratio was 34.3% when flapping motion was differed within the same wing shape. The aerodynamic performances of three flapping motions varied significantly with changes in sweeping speed and wing rotation. The difference of average in aerodynamic efficiency was 4.9% among the three wings when making the same motion, and 43.7% when the motions were differed in the same wing. The results showed that flapping motions had significant effects on aerodynamic performance. Visualization results also showed that the vortex structure changes significantly when motions are different in the same wing shapes. These findings provide valuable data for designing flapping micro air vehicles and morphing aircraft.

Indexed as

AerodynamicsFlapping motionInsect flightMicro flapping air vehicleWing shape

Identifiers

PMID39948183
PMCPMC11825878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.