ArticleScientific reports2025
Effects of shapes and kinematics of hovering flapping wings on aerodynamic forces and vortex structures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design and Simulation Study of a Jumping Takeoff Mechanism Inspired by the Hindleg Kinematics of Asian Migratory Locust,Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bridging Biology and Engineering: Unsteady Aerodynamics and Biomimetic Design of Micro Air Vehicles.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Fuzzy logic based nonlinear blending hybrid control of a kestrel-inspired ornithopter operating in sinusoidal and dryden gusts.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bioinspired Morphing in Aerodynamics and Hydrodynamics: Engineering Innovations for Aerospace and Renewable Energy.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study investigated the effects of wing shapes and flapping motions on the aerodynamic forces and vortex structures of insect flight. Aerodynamic force measurements and flow visualizations were performed in a water tank by cross-applying the wing shapes of bumblebee, hawkmoth, and hummingbird to their hovering flapping motions. When the three different wings were measured making the same motions, the average difference of lift-to-drag ratio was 2.7%. In the aspect ratio and wing area distribution range, where three wing shapes were distributed, aerodynamic performances were similar according to wing shape. However, the average difference of lift-to-drag ratio was 34.3% when flapping motion was differed within the same wing shape. The aerodynamic performances of three flapping motions varied significantly with changes in sweeping speed and wing rotation. The difference of average in aerodynamic efficiency was 4.9% among the three wings when making the same motion, and 43.7% when the motions were differed in the same wing. The results showed that flapping motions had significant effects on aerodynamic performance. Visualization results also showed that the vortex structure changes significantly when motions are different in the same wing shapes. These findings provide valuable data for designing flapping micro air vehicles and morphing aircraft.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.