Trial reportScientific reports2025
Effects of taurine combined with caffeine on repetitive sprint exercise performance and cognition in a hypoxic environment.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of serotonergic pharmacological manipulation on exercise performance and central fatigue: a systematic review and three-level meta-analysis.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Caffeine and taurine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of their individual and combined effects on physical capacity, cognitive function, and physiological markers.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Dietary interventions interact with the perception of effort and enhance endurance performance: a brief narrative review.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2026Review
- Cognitive Effects of Taurine and Related Sulphur-Containing Amino Acids: A Systematic Review of Human Trials and Considerations for Plant-Based Dietary Transitions.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Medical management of musculoskeletal pain in professional wheelchair basketball players: an evidence-based guide.Pain management · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The impact of hypoxic repetitive sprint training on the overall performance of team sports remains controversial due to the specific nature of the exercise capacity required for team sports. While taurine and caffeine are widely utilized as supplements for repetitive sprint exercise in normoxic environments, their efficacy in hypoxic environments remains to be fully understood. Therefore, additional research is needed to explore the role of supplementation in hypoxic conditions. This study was to investigate the effects of caffeine (C), taurine (T), caffeine, and taurine co-ingestion (TC) or placebo (P) on repetitive sprint exercise performance and related physiological responses after exhaustion exercise in team athletes under simulated hypoxic conditions. A double-blind crossover randomized controlled experimental design was employed. 16 male participants (Age:23.69 ± 2.15 years, Body mass: 75.04 ± 7.79 kg, Height:1.78 ± 0.06 m) volunteered to receive four different supplement ingestions to complete the exercise tests: (1) placebo (5 mg/kg maltodextrin), (2) taurine (50 mg/kg), (3) caffeine (5 mg/kg), (4) taurine + caffeine (50 mg/kg + 5 mg/kg). All selected participants were university football players who had undergone rigorous training regimens (85-95% of maximum heart rate, duration of 60 min, with more than five training sessions per week). All participants completed an exhaustion test and subsequent repetitive sprint exercise in a simulated hypoxic environment (A simulation of a soccer game in sports mode). Time to exhaustion (TTE), peak power (PP), and mean power (MP) were recorded at the end of the exhaustion test and during the repetitive sprint exercise, respectively. This study designed an exercise protocol for repetitive sprinting after exhaustion exercise based on the pattern of play in football. The following variables were monitored throughout the experiments: heart rate (HR), blood lactate (B[La]), arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), dyspnea, and rating of perceived exhaustion (RPE). The Stroop Test was administered at three separate time points: pre-test, mid-test, and post-test, throughout the exercise trial. The countermovement jump test (CMJ) was carried out at three specific time points: before the test, 3 min after the test, and 6 min after the test. The caffeine (C:618.56 + 42.50 s, p = 0.027, d = 0.996) and taurine + caffeine (TC: 613.69 + 37.74 s, p = 0.041, d = 0.902) groups significantly improved time to exhaustion compared to the placebo group. Blood lactate was significantly higher in the taurine + caffeine group than in the placebo group after repetitive sprint exercise (P: 9.87 ± 1.97, TC: 12.31 ± 2.54, p = 0.016). The caffeine group significantly reduced dyspnea, and rating of perceived exhaustion after repetitive sprint exercise (p < 0.05). The taurine (T: 43.42 ± 3.46, p = 0.005), caffeine (C: 44.11 ± 4.72, p < 0.001), and taurine + caffeine (TC: 43.04 ± 3.30, p = 0.011) groups all showed an increase in pre-exercise countermovement jump height. The caffeine group significantly reduced the consistent response time (p = 0.023) and inconsistent response time (p < 0.001) in the Stroop Test compared to the placebo group. Caffeine, along with combined taurine, significantly prolonged the duration of exhaustion exercise in a hypoxic environment; however, it did not affect subsequent repetitive sprint performance. Additionally, caffeine supplementation had a positive impact on cognitive performance during hypoxic training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.