ArticleScientific reports2025
A single-center study examining the safety and effectiveness of ERCP with pancreatoscopy and endoluminal radiofrequency ablation for main-duct IPMN treatment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endoscopic management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the safety and efficacy of treatment for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) involving the main pancreatic duct (MPD) using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) combined with digital single-operator pancreatoscopy and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). A retrospective analysis was performed. Patients with episodes of acute pancreatitis at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were screened. When the diagnosis of IPMN was confirmed by ERCP with pancreatoscopy, patients who underwent endoluminal RFA treatment were enrolled. The most frequent complications were monitored to assess the safety of treatment. Disease progression and recurrence of pancreatitis symptoms were regarded as the indicators of treatment efficacy. In total, 50 patients were screened, and 14 patients who undertook the lesion ablation using RFA were enrolled. Mild adverse events occurred, while they were relieved under symptomatic treatment. No severe complications were recorded. All patients received regular follow-ups, during which an episode of IPMN-related pancreatitis occurred in 1 patient, and disease progression was found in 1 patient who successively underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Regional treatment of IPMN lesions in the MPD exhibited satisfactory effect in preventing lesion progression and relieving pancreatitis symptoms through the combined use of ERCP with pancreatoscopy and RFA, without causing severe complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.