Trial reportScientific reports2025
Prognosis and quality of life in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after abdominoperineal resection in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomized phase 3 trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic vs. laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: perioperative outcomes and survival.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Significant Correlation of Dynamic Pan-Immune Inflammation Value and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Response in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Pretreatment comprehensive nutritional index predicts survival in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Surgical treatment of colorectal cancer: A multidimensional review.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low anterior resection (LAR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR) are the two main surgical procedures after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer. APR is associated with poorer prognosis; however existing data do not consider intensified CRT (5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Oxaliplatin + radiation) protocols. Clinicopathological data of patients treated with APR and LAR from the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial were analysed in terms of prognostic parameters and quality of life (QoL). Based on higher response rate after intensified CRT, subgroup analyses were performed. Data from n = 1173 patients were assessed. APR after preoperative CRT was associated with a significantly worse overall survival (p = 0.0056), disease-free survival (p < 0.0001) and local recurrence rate (p = 0.0047). Clinicopathological data including clinical T stage (p < 0.000001), grading (p = 0.0038), postoperative lymph node (LN) positivity (p = 0.013), and number of positive LN (p = 0.0049) significantly differed between procedures and showed higher values in APR patients. The quality of total mesorectal excision (TME) was significantly better (p < 0.0001) and complete resection rates were higher (p = 0.0022) in LAR compared to APR patients. Subgroup analyses showed worse LR rates in APR patients after standard CRT (5-FU mono and radiation) but not after intensified CRT. After 3 years, role functioning (p = 0.019) and physical functioning (p = 0.001) had a slightly poorer outcome in APR patients. The poorer prognosis of patients undergoing APR for locally advanced rectal cancer may be explained by clinicopathological characteristics. Intensified CRT may compensate for the higher risk of LR after APR in patients with worse TME quality. QoL in APR patients was comparable to LAR patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.