Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39947905›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2025

Decoding Visual Spatial Attention Control.

Sreenivasan Meyyappan, Abhijit Rajan, Qiang Yang, George R Mangun, Mingzhou Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Neural Mechanisms of Willed Attention Control.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sreenivasan MeyyappanCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, California 95618.
Abhijit RajanJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611.
Qiang YangJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611.
George R MangunCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, California 95618 mding@bme.ufl.edu mangun@ucdavis.edu.
Mingzhou DingJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 mding@bme.ufl.edu mangun@ucdavis.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1024-3503

Funding

Mechanisms of attentional control: Structure and dynamics from simultaneous EEG-fMRI and machine learningR01MH117991 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI DING, MINGZHOU, MANGUN, GEORGE R · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In models of visual spatial attention control, it is commonly held that top-down control signals originate in the dorsal attention network, propagating to the visual cortex to modulate baseline neural activity and bias sensory processing. However, the precise distribution of these top-down influences across different levels of the visual hierarchy is debated. In addition, it is unclear whether these baseline neural activity changes translate into improved performance. We analyzed attention-related baseline activity during the anticipatory period of a voluntary spatial attention task, using two independent functional magnetic resonance imaging datasets and two analytic approaches. First, as in prior studies, univariate analysis showed that covert attention significantly enhanced baseline neural activity in higher-order visual areas contralateral to the attended visual hemifield, while effects in lower-order visual areas (e.g., V1) were weaker and more variable. Second, in contrast, multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) revealed significant decoding of attention conditions across all visual cortical areas, with lower-order visual areas exhibiting higher decoding accuracies than higher-order areas. Third, decoding accuracy, rather than the magnitude of univariate activation, was a better predictor of a subject's stimulus discrimination performance. Finally, the MVPA results were replicated across two experimental conditions, where the direction of spatial attention was either externally instructed by a cue or based on the participants' free choice decision about where to attend. Together, these findings offer new insights into the extent of attentional biases in the visual hierarchy under top-down control and how these biases influence both sensory processing and behavioral performance.

Indexed as

AttentionSpace PerceptionVisual CortexVisual PerceptionAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultfMRIMVPAMVPA-behaviorspatial attentiontop–down controlvisual hierarchy

Identifiers

PMID39947905
PMCPMC11875837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.