Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39947880›Full record

ArticleChinese medical journal2025

Development and multicenter validation of machine learning models for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications after neurosurgery.

Ming Xu, Wenhao Zhu, Siyu Hou, Hongzhi Xu, Jingwen Xia, Liyu Lin, Hao Fu, Mingyu You, Jiafeng Wang, Zhi Xie and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Risk prediction of non-small cell lung cancer in patients with pulmonary nodules: a single-center cohort study based on six machine learning algorithms.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ming XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Wenhao ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Siyu HouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Hongzhi XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Jingwen XiaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Liyu LinState Key Laboratory of Integrated Chips and Systems, Fudan University, Shanghai 201203, China.
Hao FuDepartment of Control Science and Engineering, College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China.
Mingyu YouDepartment of Control Science and Engineering, College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China.
Jiafeng WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Zhi XieDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Neuromedical Center, Shanghai 200331, China.
Xiaohong WenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, China.
Yingwei WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are major adverse events in neurosurgical patients. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models predicting PPCs after neurosurgery.

methodsPPCs were defined according to the European Perioperative Clinical Outcome standards as occurring within 7 postoperative days. Data of cases meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria were extracted from the anesthesia information management system to create three datasets: The development (data of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University from 2018 to 2020), temporal validation (data of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University in 2021) and external validation (data of other three hospitals in 2023) datasets. Machine learning models of six algorithms were trained using either 35 retrievable and plausible features or the 11 features selected by Lasso regression. Temporal validation was conducted for all models and the 11-feature models were also externally validated. Independent risk factors were identified and feature importance in top models was analyzed.

resultsPPCs occurred in 712 of 7533 (9.5%), 258 of 2824 (9.1%), and 207 of 2300 (9.0%) patients in the development, temporal validation and external validation datasets, respectively. During cross-validation training, all models except Bayes demonstrated good discrimination with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.840. In temporal validation of full-feature models, deep neural network (DNN) performed the best with an AUC of 0.835 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.805-0.858) and a Brier score of 0.069, followed by Logistic regression (LR), random forest and XGBoost. The 11-feature models performed comparable to full-feature models with very close but statistically significantly lower AUCs, with the top models of DNN and LR in temporal and external validations. An 11-feature nomogram was drawn based on the LR algorithm and it outperformed the minimally modified Assess respiratory RIsk in Surgical patients in CATalonia (ARISCAT) and Laparoscopic Surgery Video Educational Guidelines (LAS VEGAS) scores with a higher AUC (LR: 0.824, ARISCAT: 0.672, LAS: 0.663). Independent risk factors based on multivariate LR mostly overlapped with Lasso-selected features, but lacked consistency with the important features using the Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) method of the LR model.

conclusionsThe developed models, especially the DNN model and the nomogram, had good discrimination and calibration, and could be used for predicting PPCs in neurosurgical patients. The establishment of machine learning models and the ascertainment of risk factors might assist clinical decision support for improving surgical outcomes.

trial registrationChiCTR 2100047474; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=128279 .

Indexed as

Lung DiseasesMachine LearningNeurosurgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsROC CurveDeep neural networkMachine learningNeurosurgeryPostoperative pulmonary complicationsPrediction model

Identifiers

PMID39947880
PMCPMC12407168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.