ArticleEmergency medicine journal : EMJ2025
Multicentre cross-sectional study to assess nursing workload in Belgian emergency departments.
Article in Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors associated with work-life balance among emergency physicians, nurses, and paramedics: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- The Work Behind the Work: Logistical-Administrative Workload, Health Technology Satisfaction and Missed Nursing Care Among Belgian Hospital Nurses.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExcessive workload in emergency departments (ED) negatively affects patient safety, often leading to missed critical tasks due to time constraints. The Workload Assessment of Nurses on Emergency (WANE) scale developed in Belgium offers a detailed measurement of nursing workload, but its complexity makes it hard to use in practice. Our study aims to find a simpler method for assessing nursing workload in EDs.
methodsA multicentre cross-sectional study was performed in four Belgian EDs between September 2022 and March 2023. Nursing workload was assessed using the WANE scale in each hospital, during 4-hour time periods. The associations between WANE scores, and nurses' subjective workload assessment, number of patients, patient triage levels, post-triage destination area and the Jones Dependency Tool Score were examined employing multiple linear regression models.
results161 nurses, caring for 591 patients, were included. 67% of the variation in 'direct' care time could be explained with a model based on triage level and two items of the Jones Dependency Tool (ABC perturbation and mobility). The number of new patients admitted and nurses' perceived workload were also highly associated with the total nursing care time TNCT. The actual number of patients in the ED at any time explained 78% of the variation in TNCT. Each additional patient increases the TNTC by 45.22 min.
conclusionsSimple indicators might be used to evaluate the nursing care time in Belgian EDs. A retrospective method is suggested, using the total number of patients over a defined period of time. This study reveals a path to a predictive method to calculate the direct care time for each patient with three simple indicators, available from nursing triage stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.