ArticleBMJ open2025
Baby Sleep Project Protocol: a realist evaluation of an intervention to reduce preventable infant mortality.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Caregiver lived experiences attempting to follow safe sleep recommendations to sleep their baby in a cot: a qualitative directed content analysis.Primary health care research & development · 2026Article
- "Okay in theory": a qualitative study of safer sleep advice in families with infants at risk and families reporting risky sleep practices.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Article
- Beyond the rules: an integrative review of parental perspectives on safer infant sleep in shared environments.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn the UK, approximately 300 infants each year die suddenly and unexpectedly, with most deaths remaining unexplained. Population-wide 'Safer Sleep' messages have brought rates down but remaining deaths now predominantly occur within families experiencing poverty. Many of these deaths may be preventable as the majority have known, avoidable risks present. New resources and tools for health professionals and families have been developed to address modifiable barriers to implementing safer sleep advice in this priority group of families. This study aims to understand how the Baby Sleep Project resources work to improve the uptake of safer sleep advice, including for whom, and in what contexts they work best. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Realist evaluation will be used, including both qualitative and quantitative methods. Data will be collected both pre- and post-health professional training in the new resources. We will invite neonatal staff, health visitors and family nurse partnerships nurses, and primary caregivers of infants to take part. We will carry out qualitative interviews with health professionals and caregivers. Quantitative surveys looking at implementation for health professionals, changes in infant care knowledge and practice, and parenting self-efficacy will be conducted with caregivers. Mechanisms of action, contexts and outcomes from the new resources will be tested against the initial programme theory. The findings from this research will inform evidence-based explanations of how to improve the uptake of health advice in priority populations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was given a favourable opinion by the South West-Frenchay Research Ethics Committee (ref: 23/SW/0119). We will publish our findings in academic journals and talk about them at conferences. We will make sure the people who took part in the study hear about them first. If the resources are shown to be useful, we will work with charities and the National Health Service to roll them out across the whole of the UK. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN3364337.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.