Observational studyLupus science & medicine2025
Prediction of mortality risk in critically ill patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a machine learning approach using the MIMIC-IV database.
Observational study in Lupus science & medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The application of artificial intelligence in systemic lupus erythematosus: a bibliometric analysis of current trends and future directions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Advancements and Novel Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The predictive value of serological markers for successful weaning and 30-day mortality in patients with severe intracerebral hemorrhage.BMC neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEarly prediction of long-term outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) remains a great challenge in clinical practice. Our study aims to develop and validate predictive models for the mortality risk.
methodsThis observational study identified patients with SLE requiring hospital admission from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database. We downloaded data from Fujian Provincial Hospital as an external validation set. Variable selection was performed using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. Then, we constructed two predictive models: a traditional nomogram based on logistic regression and a machine learning model employing a stacking ensemble approach. The predictive ability of the models was evaluated by the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the calibration curve.
resultsA total of 395 patients and 100 patients were enrolled respectively from MIMIC-IV database and the validation cohort. The LASSO regression identified 18 significant variables. Both models demonstrated good discrimination, with AUCs above 0.8. The machine learning model outperformed the nomogram in terms of precision and specificity, highlighting its potential superiority in risk prediction. The SHapley additive explanations analysis further elucidated the contribution of each variable to the model's predictions, emphasising the importance of factors such as urine output, age, weight and alanine aminotransferase.
conclusionsThe machine learning model provides a superior tool for predicting mortality risk in patients with SLE, offering a basis for clinical decision-making and potential improvements in patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.